ESGP.DE vs. G2XJ.DE
ESGP.DE (Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF) and G2XJ.DE (VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS) are both Gold funds - ESGP.DE tracks the VettaFi Gold Miners Screened Index while G2XJ.DE tracks the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESGP.DE returned 12.10%/yr vs 46.12%/yr for G2XJ.DE. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ESGP.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for G2XJ.DE.
Performance
ESGP.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGP.DE achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly higher than G2XJ.DE's -4.54% return.
ESGP.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- YTD
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 16.79%
- 3Y*
- 12.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.11%
G2XJ.DE
- 1D
- 8.61%
- 1M
- 5.02%
- 6M
- -11.56%
- YTD
- -4.54%
- 1Y
- 64.08%
- 3Y*
- 46.12%
- 5Y*
- 22.86%
- 10Y*
- 9.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| €39.71K | €29.56K | €19.03K | |
| €1.92M | €2.07M | €3.05M |
ESGP.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGP.DE Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF | 14.56% | 5.79% | 12.94% | 2.10% | -2.36% | 2.90% |
G2XJ.DE VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS | -4.54% | 149.58% | 21.45% | 3.64% | -6.11% | 4.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGP.DE and G2XJ.DE is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGP.DE vs. G2XJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ESGP.DE
G2XJ.DE
ESGP.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGP.DE | G2XJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.21 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 1.67 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | 3.52 | +4.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGP.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGP.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum G2XJ.DE drawdown of -49.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGP.DE and G2XJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGP.DE | G2XJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -49.96% | +29.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.31% | -38.10% | +31.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.50% | -38.10% | +17.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -26.59% | +26.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.17% | -25.38% | +20.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 18.17% | -15.95% |
Volatility
ESGP.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) is 3.01%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) has a volatility of 17.29%. This indicates that ESGP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G2XJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGP.DE | G2XJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 17.29% | -14.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 40.32% | -31.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.47% | 52.18% | -40.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 38.42% | -24.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 38.10% | -23.69% |
ESGP.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGP.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than G2XJ.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGP.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESGP.DE nor G2XJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGP.DE and G2XJ.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, G2XJ.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
G2XJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ESGP.DE.
ESGP.DE tracks VettaFi Gold Miners Screened Index, while G2XJ.DE tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ESGP.DE and 0.55% for G2XJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for ESGP.DE and G2XJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer