ESGN vs. CIL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL).

ESGN and CIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESGN is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the MSCI Beta ADV Sust Intl Equity Income 100. It was launched on Jun 13, 2016. CIL is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Aug 19, 2015. Both ESGN and CIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ESGN vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ESGN vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ESGN Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF	6.14%	39.85%	6.02%	20.88%	-5.95%	10.18%	-0.52%	15.83%	-18.30%	24.88%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	32.99%	3.76%	16.29%	-16.00%	11.07%	7.21%	19.13%	-13.34%	27.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGN achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return.

ESGN

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: -2.53%
• YTD: 6.14%
• 6M: 14.00%
• 1Y: 34.08%
• 3Y*: 20.71%
• 5Y*: 12.48%
• 10Y*: —

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 10.30%
• 1Y: 28.86%
• 3Y*: 16.16%
• 5Y*: 8.79%
• 10Y*: 8.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGN vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ESGN and CIL have an expense ratio of 0.45%.

ESGN

Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF

CIL

VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF

Return for Risk

ESGN vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGN

ESGN Risk / Return Rank: 90
ESGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
ESGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
ESGN Omega Ratio Rank: 91
ESGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ESGN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 91
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGN vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESGN	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	2.28	-0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	3.13	-0.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.53	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	2.33	+0.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.96	15.18	-2.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESGN vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGN Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGN and CIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESGN	CIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	2.28	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	0.53	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.44	+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between ESGN and CIL is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ESGN vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

ESGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, more than CIL's 2.38% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ESGN Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF	9.30%	9.76%	3.11%	3.27%	3.57%	3.43%	2.64%	3.34%	7.25%	4.63%	2.52%	0.00%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	2.38%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%

Drawdowns

ESGN vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGN drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than CIL's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGN and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESGN	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.71%	-36.27%	-5.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.52%	-9.66%	-1.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.51%	-29.89%	+5.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.56%	-0.58%	-3.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.13%	-6.65%	-0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	1.73%	+0.91%

Volatility

ESGN vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that ESGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESGN	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	0.00%	+6.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.85%	5.73%	+4.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.96%	13.28%	+3.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.23%	16.66%	-1.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.33%	17.32%	-0.99%