PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGN vs. BKIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGN vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ESGN having a 8.09% return and BKIE slightly higher at 8.46%.


ESGN

1D
0.54%
1M
0.78%
YTD
8.09%
6M
11.60%
1Y
25.97%
3Y*
20.05%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*

BKIE

1D
-0.89%
1M
3.12%
YTD
8.46%
6M
11.11%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
17.39%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGN vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESGN
Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF
8.09%39.85%6.02%20.88%-5.95%10.18%31.94%
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
8.46%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%13.75%34.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGN and BKIE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020

0.90

The correlation between ESGN and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGN vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGN
BKIE

Industrials

15.8%
18.6%

Financial Services

15.4%
25.8%

Energy

13.0%
5.9%

Utilities

9.3%
3.7%

Technology

7.0%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
7.3%

Healthcare

3.9%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
6.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
7.2%

Communication Services

1.2%
4.2%

Real Estate

0.2%
2.0%

Industrials

ESGN
15.8%
BKIE
18.6%

Financial Services

ESGN
15.4%
BKIE
25.8%

Energy

ESGN
13.0%
BKIE
5.9%

Utilities

ESGN
9.3%
BKIE
3.7%

Technology

ESGN
7.0%
BKIE
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGN
6.6%
BKIE
7.3%

Healthcare

ESGN
3.9%
BKIE
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

ESGN
3.5%
BKIE
6.2%

Basic Materials

ESGN
1.9%
BKIE
7.2%

Communication Services

ESGN
1.2%
BKIE
4.2%

Real Estate

ESGN
0.2%
BKIE
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGN vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGN
ESGN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ESGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGN Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGN Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGN vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGNBKIEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

1.56

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

2.23

+0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

1.99

+0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.64

7.68

+2.97

ESGN vs. BKIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGN Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the BKIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGN and BKIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGNBKIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.56

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.56

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.92

-0.31

Drawdowns

ESGN vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGN drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGN and BKIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGNBKIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.71%

-28.19%

-13.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-11.41%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.38%

-13.19%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

-28.19%

+3.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-1.33%

-1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-4.98%

-2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.95%

-0.37%

Volatility

ESGN vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) is 4.05%, while BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that ESGN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGNBKIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

4.42%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.58%

12.17%

-1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

14.58%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.29%

16.12%

-0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.31%

16.34%

-0.03%

ESGN vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGN vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison

ESGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.13%, more than BKIE's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.26%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESGN
Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF
9.13%9.76%3.11%3.27%3.57%3.43%2.64%3.34%7.25%4.63%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGN and BKIE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKIE has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to ESGN (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGN dropped -41.71% vs BKIE's -28.19%.

On 5-year performance, ESGN leads with 12.09% vs 9.05% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ESGN has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGN has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ESGN.

ESGN has the higher dividend yield at 9.13%, compared with 3.26% for BKIE.

ESGN tracks MSCI Beta ADV Sust Intl Equity Income 100, while BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ESGN and 0.04% for BKIE.

ESGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGN and BKIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer