ESGN vs. BKIE
ESGN (Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - ESGN tracks the MSCI Beta ADV Sust Intl Equity Income 100 while BKIE tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGN returned 12.09%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for BKIE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESGN charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.
Performance
ESGN vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ESGN having a 8.09% return and BKIE slightly higher at 8.46%.
ESGN
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 8.09%
- 6M
- 11.60%
- 1Y
- 25.97%
- 3Y*
- 20.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- —
BKIE
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- 1Y
- 22.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGN vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGN Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF | 8.09% | 39.85% | 6.02% | 20.88% | -5.95% | 10.18% | 31.94% |
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 8.46% | 32.08% | 4.63% | 18.25% | -13.60% | 13.75% | 34.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGN and BKIE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between ESGN and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESGN vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGN
BKIE
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Industrials
ESGN
BKIE
Financial Services
ESGN
BKIE
Energy
ESGN
BKIE
Utilities
ESGN
BKIE
Technology
ESGN
BKIE
Consumer Cyclical
ESGN
BKIE
Healthcare
ESGN
BKIE
Consumer Defensive
ESGN
BKIE
Basic Materials
ESGN
BKIE
Communication Services
ESGN
BKIE
Real Estate
ESGN
BKIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGN vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank
ESGN
BKIE
ESGN vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGN | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 1.56 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | 2.23 | +0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.28 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 1.99 | +0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.64 | 7.68 | +2.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGN | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 1.56 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.56 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.92 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
ESGN vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGN drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGN and BKIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGN | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -28.19% | -13.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -11.41% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.38% | -13.19% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | -28.19% | +3.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -1.33% | -1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -4.98% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.95% | -0.37% |
Volatility
ESGN vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) is 4.05%, while BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that ESGN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGN | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 4.42% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.58% | 12.17% | -1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.48% | 14.58% | -1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 16.12% | -0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 16.34% | -0.03% |
ESGN vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGN vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison
ESGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.13%, more than BKIE's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESGN Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF | 9.13% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGN and BKIE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKIE has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to ESGN (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGN dropped -41.71% vs BKIE's -28.19%.
On 5-year performance, ESGN leads with 12.09% vs 9.05% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ESGN has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESGN has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ESGN.
ESGN has the higher dividend yield at 9.13%, compared with 3.26% for BKIE.
ESGN tracks MSCI Beta ADV Sust Intl Equity Income 100, while BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ESGN and 0.04% for BKIE.
ESGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGN and BKIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer