PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGG vs. FTCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGG vs. FTCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGG achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly higher than FTCS's 0.01% return.


ESGG

1D
-0.48%
1M
8.86%
YTD
14.72%
6M
16.28%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
21.51%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*

FTCS

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
0.01%
6M
0.21%
1Y
2.29%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
5.40%
10Y*
10.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGG vs. FTCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
14.72%24.01%14.48%25.57%-18.66%23.76%17.32%29.10%-8.44%23.60%
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
0.01%6.46%11.19%8.48%-10.22%26.75%13.05%26.71%-4.22%26.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGG and FTCS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2016

0.72

The correlation between ESGG and FTCS shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESGG vs. FTCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGG
FTCS

Technology

39.9%
12.3%

Financial Services

19.4%
20.4%

Healthcare

11.8%
19.1%

Industrials

5.2%
19.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
14.3%

Energy

4.3%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
7.7%

Basic Materials

2.4%
2.1%

Utilities

2.1%

-

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Communication Services

0.9%
2.3%

Technology

ESGG
39.9%
FTCS
12.3%

Financial Services

ESGG
19.4%
FTCS
20.4%

Healthcare

ESGG
11.8%
FTCS
19.1%

Industrials

ESGG
5.2%
FTCS
19.6%

Consumer Defensive

ESGG
5.0%
FTCS
14.3%

Energy

ESGG
4.3%
FTCS
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGG
4.0%
FTCS
7.7%

Basic Materials

ESGG
2.4%
FTCS
2.1%

Utilities

ESGG
2.1%
FTCS

-

Real Estate

ESGG
1.2%
FTCS

-

Communication Services

ESGG
0.9%
FTCS
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGG vs. FTCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGG
ESGG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ESGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGG Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FTCS
FTCS Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FTCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCS Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGG vs. FTCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGGFTCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.05

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

0.30

+3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.38

0.73

+14.65

ESGG vs. FTCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGG Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the FTCS Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGG and FTCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGGFTCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

0.23

+2.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.41

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.50

+0.36

Drawdowns

ESGG vs. FTCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum FTCS drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and FTCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGGFTCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-53.64%

+21.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-7.74%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.71%

-12.62%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-20.93%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-6.95%

+6.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-6.92%

+2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

3.14%

-1.09%

Volatility

ESGG vs. FTCS - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) at 2.64%. This indicates that ESGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGGFTCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

2.64%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

6.99%

+2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

9.82%

+2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

13.13%

+2.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

15.54%

+0.97%

ESGG vs. FTCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FTCS's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGG vs. FTCS - Dividend Comparison

ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than FTCS's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
1.21%1.39%1.84%1.73%1.83%1.34%1.36%1.94%2.12%1.71%0.87%0.00%
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
1.12%1.04%1.33%1.47%1.23%1.06%0.93%1.26%1.26%1.15%1.43%1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGG and FTCS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESGG has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to FTCS (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGG dropped -32.31% vs FTCS's -53.64%.

On 5-year performance, ESGG leads with 12.78% vs 5.40% for FTCS. On fees, ESGG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, FTCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGG has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for FTCS.

ESGG has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 1.12% for FTCS.

ESGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FTCS is Large Cap Blend Equities. ESGG tracks STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while FTCS tracks The Capital Strength Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ESGG and 0.53% for FTCS.

ESGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGG and FTCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer