PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGG vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGG vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGG achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 11.30% return.


ESGG

1D
0.53%
1M
1.39%
6M
11.36%
YTD
14.95%
1Y
27.50%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
13.94%
ALL TIME*
13.88%

BBUS

1D
1.46%
1M
1.67%
6M
9.38%
YTD
11.30%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.15M$23.57M$29.57M
$88.70K$102.70K$84.24K

ESGG vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
14.95%24.01%14.48%25.57%-18.66%23.76%17.32%16.94%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
11.30%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGG and BBUS is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.93

The correlation between ESGG and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGG vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGG
BBUS

Technology

40.0%
38.7%

Financial Services

19.5%
11.6%

Healthcare

14.1%
8.9%

Industrials

6.8%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
9.4%

Energy

4.2%
3.0%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.6%

Utilities

1.4%
2.2%

Communication Services

1.3%
9.9%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.7%

Technology

ESGG
40.0%
BBUS
38.7%

Financial Services

ESGG
19.5%
BBUS
11.6%

Healthcare

ESGG
14.1%
BBUS
8.9%

Industrials

ESGG
6.8%
BBUS
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

ESGG
5.4%
BBUS
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGG
4.4%
BBUS
9.4%

Energy

ESGG
4.2%
BBUS
3.0%

Basic Materials

ESGG
2.0%
BBUS
1.6%

Utilities

ESGG
1.4%
BBUS
2.2%

Communication Services

ESGG
1.3%
BBUS
9.9%

Real Estate

ESGG
1.1%
BBUS
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGG vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESGG
ESGG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ESGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGG Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESGG vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGGBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.32

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

2.46

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

10.36

+2.36

ESGG vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGG Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGG and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGG vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGGBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-35.35%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-9.21%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.71%

-19.01%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-25.46%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.12%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-5.38%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.18%

-0.01%

Volatility

ESGG vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 3.82%. This indicates that ESGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGGBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

3.82%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.16%

10.23%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.24%

12.87%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

17.17%

-0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

19.50%

-2.95%

ESGG vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGG vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than BBUS's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESGG
FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund
1.28%1.39%1.84%1.73%1.83%1.34%1.36%1.94%2.12%1.71%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ESGG and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ESGG has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to BBUS (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGG dropped -32.31% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 12.56% vs 12.16% for ESGG. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 12.56% return vs 12.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for ESGG.

ESGG has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.00% for BBUS.

ESGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. ESGG tracks STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ESGG and 0.02% for BBUS.

ESGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGG and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer