ESGD vs. XJH

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

ESGD (iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF) and XJH (iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGD is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index, while XJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGD returned 8.21%/yr vs 8.10%/yr for XJH. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESGD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XJH.

Performance

ESGD vs. XJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGD achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly lower than XJH's 15.50% return.

ESGD

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 3.97%
• YTD: 9.85%
• 6M: 10.51%
• 1Y: 21.72%
• 3Y*: 15.36%
• 5Y*: 8.21%
• 10Y*: —

XJH

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 5.84%
• YTD: 15.50%
• 6M: 14.25%
• 1Y: 29.19%
• 3Y*: 15.17%
• 5Y*: 8.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGD vs. XJH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ESGD iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF	9.85%	29.63%	3.95%	18.53%	-15.17%	11.79%	17.33%
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF	15.50%	8.12%	12.27%	16.74%	-14.36%	23.43%	29.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGD and XJH is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020	0.74

The correlation between ESGD and XJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGD vs. XJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESGD	XJH
Financial Services	25.8%	14.0%
Industrials	18.2%	26.8%
Technology	12.6%	16.7%
Healthcare	9.9%	9.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.0%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	9.6%
Basic Materials	5.5%	5.0%
Communication Services	4.3%	1.1%
Energy	3.9%	2.9%
Utilities	3.7%	1.5%
Real Estate	1.6%	8.1%

Return for Risk

ESGD vs. XJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGD

ESGD Risk / Return Rank: 43
ESGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ESGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ESGD Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ESGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
ESGD Martin Ratio Rank: 46

XJH

XJH Risk / Return Rank: 60
XJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
XJH Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
XJH Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGD vs. XJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESGD	XJH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.77	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	2.56	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.30	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	3.05	-1.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.97	11.24	-4.27

ESGD vs. XJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGD Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the XJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGD and XJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ESGD vs. XJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGD drawdown since its inception was -33.70%, which is greater than XJH's maximum drawdown of -25.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGD and XJH.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESGD	XJH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.70%	-25.07%	-8.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.68%	-9.61%	-2.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.86%	-24.56%	+10.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.03%	-25.07%	-4.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.17%	-6.79%	+0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	2.60%	+0.53%

Volatility

ESGD vs. XJH - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) at 5.22%. This indicates that ESGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESGD	XJH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.58%	5.22%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.32%	12.32%	+1.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.82%	16.61%	-0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.73%	19.99%	-3.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.00%	19.89%	-2.89%

ESGD vs. XJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XJH's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ESGD vs. XJH - Dividend Comparison

ESGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than XJH's 1.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ESGD iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF	4.92%	3.60%	3.23%	3.02%	2.59%	2.75%	1.63%	2.57%	2.69%	2.65%	0.09%
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF	1.31%	1.24%	1.24%	1.38%	1.45%	1.04%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESGD and XJH in my portfolio?

ESGD and XJH have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ESGD or XJH?

ESGD has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to XJH (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGD dropped -33.70% vs XJH's -25.07%.

Which ETF is better, ESGD or XJH?

On 5-year performance, ESGD leads with 8.21% vs 8.10% for XJH. On fees, XJH is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, XJH has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ESGD or XJH?

Over the 5-year period, ESGD has performed better with a 8.21% return vs 8.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESGD or XJH?

XJH is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ESGD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESGD or XJH?

ESGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 1.31% for XJH.

What is the main difference between ESGD and XJH?

ESGD is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XJH is Mid Cap Blend Equities. ESGD tracks MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index, while XJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ESGD and 0.12% for XJH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.