ESGD vs. DMXF
ESGD (iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF) and DMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from iShares - ESGD tracks the MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index while DMXF tracks the MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGD returned 8.06%/yr vs 7.00%/yr for DMXF. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESGD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DMXF.
Performance
ESGD vs. DMXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGD achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly lower than DMXF's 12.40% return.
ESGD
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 9.10%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 20.58%
- 3Y*
- 16.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- —
DMXF
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 12.40%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 19.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGD vs. DMXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGD iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF | 9.10% | 29.63% | 3.95% | 18.53% | -15.17% | 11.79% | 20.58% |
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 12.40% | 22.07% | 3.99% | 20.52% | -19.25% | 10.90% | 23.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGD and DMXF is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between ESGD and DMXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESGD vs. DMXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGD
DMXF
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
ESGD
DMXF
Industrials
ESGD
DMXF
Technology
ESGD
DMXF
Healthcare
ESGD
DMXF
Consumer Cyclical
ESGD
DMXF
Consumer Defensive
ESGD
DMXF
Basic Materials
ESGD
DMXF
Communication Services
ESGD
DMXF
Energy
ESGD
DMXF
-
Utilities
ESGD
DMXF
Real Estate
ESGD
DMXF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGD vs. DMXF — Risk / Return Rank
ESGD
DMXF
ESGD vs. DMXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGD | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.22 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 1.66 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.63 | 6.22 | +0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGD | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.22 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.40 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.66 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
ESGD vs. DMXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGD drawdown since its inception was -33.70%, roughly equal to the maximum DMXF drawdown of -34.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGD and DMXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGD | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.70% | -34.52% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.68% | -11.84% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.86% | -16.54% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.03% | -34.52% | +4.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | 0.00% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -7.66% | +1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 3.15% | -0.04% |
Volatility
ESGD vs. DMXF - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) have volatilities of 4.77% and 4.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGD | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 4.98% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.60% | 13.31% | -0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.21% | 16.06% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 17.68% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 17.25% | -0.28% |
ESGD vs. DMXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DMXF's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESGD vs. DMXF - Dividend Comparison
ESGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than DMXF's 4.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 4.31% | 4.85% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.37% | 1.91% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESGD iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.30% | 3.60% | 3.23% | 3.02% | 2.59% | 2.75% | 1.63% | 2.57% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, ESGD and DMXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DMXF has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to ESGD (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGD dropped -33.70% vs DMXF's -34.52%.
On 5-year performance, ESGD leads with 8.06% vs 7.00% for DMXF. On fees, DMXF is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, ESGD has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESGD has performed better with a 8.06% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DMXF is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ESGD.
DMXF has the higher dividend yield at 4.31%, compared with 3.30% for ESGD.
ESGD tracks MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index, while DMXF tracks MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ESGD and 0.12% for DMXF.
ESGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGD and DMXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer