PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGD vs. DMXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGD vs. DMXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGD achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly lower than DMXF's 12.40% return.


ESGD

1D
0.73%
1M
2.89%
YTD
9.10%
6M
10.97%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*

DMXF

1D
0.79%
1M
4.89%
YTD
12.40%
6M
13.63%
1Y
19.57%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGD vs. DMXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
9.10%29.63%3.95%18.53%-15.17%11.79%20.58%
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
12.40%22.07%3.99%20.52%-19.25%10.90%23.13%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGD and DMXF is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.94

The correlation between ESGD and DMXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGD vs. DMXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGD
DMXF

Financial Services

26.4%
31.6%

Industrials

19.2%
16.3%

Technology

11.7%
18.3%

Healthcare

10.3%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
2.3%

Basic Materials

4.6%
4.8%

Communication Services

4.0%
7.0%

Energy

3.9%

-

Utilities

3.9%
0.6%

Real Estate

2.0%
3.9%

Financial Services

ESGD
26.4%
DMXF
31.6%

Industrials

ESGD
19.2%
DMXF
16.3%

Technology

ESGD
11.7%
DMXF
18.3%

Healthcare

ESGD
10.3%
DMXF
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGD
7.6%
DMXF
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

ESGD
6.4%
DMXF
2.3%

Basic Materials

ESGD
4.6%
DMXF
4.8%

Communication Services

ESGD
4.0%
DMXF
7.0%

Energy

ESGD
3.9%
DMXF

-

Utilities

ESGD
3.9%
DMXF
0.6%

Real Estate

ESGD
2.0%
DMXF
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGD vs. DMXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGD
ESGD Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ESGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGD Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGD Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

DMXF
DMXF Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
DMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGD vs. DMXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGDDMXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.22

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

1.66

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.63

6.22

+0.41

ESGD vs. DMXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGD Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the DMXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGD and DMXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGDDMXFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.22

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.40

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.66

-0.08

Drawdowns

ESGD vs. DMXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGD drawdown since its inception was -33.70%, roughly equal to the maximum DMXF drawdown of -34.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGD and DMXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGDDMXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.70%

-34.52%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.68%

-11.84%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.86%

-16.54%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.03%

-34.52%

+4.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

0.00%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-7.66%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

3.15%

-0.04%

Volatility

ESGD vs. DMXF - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) have volatilities of 4.77% and 4.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGDDMXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

4.98%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

13.31%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.21%

16.06%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.61%

17.68%

-1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

17.25%

-0.28%

ESGD vs. DMXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DMXF's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESGD vs. DMXF - Dividend Comparison

ESGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than DMXF's 4.31% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
4.31%4.85%2.92%2.29%2.37%1.91%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
3.30%3.60%3.23%3.02%2.59%2.75%1.63%2.57%2.69%2.65%0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, ESGD and DMXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DMXF has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to ESGD (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGD dropped -33.70% vs DMXF's -34.52%.

On 5-year performance, ESGD leads with 8.06% vs 7.00% for DMXF. On fees, DMXF is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, ESGD has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGD has performed better with a 8.06% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DMXF is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ESGD.

DMXF has the higher dividend yield at 4.31%, compared with 3.30% for ESGD.

ESGD tracks MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index, while DMXF tracks MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ESGD and 0.12% for DMXF.

ESGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGD and DMXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer