ESGB.L vs. KROG.L
ESGB.L (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD) and KROG.L (Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from VanEck and Global X respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESGB.L returned 16.72%/yr vs -1.99%/yr for KROG.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESGB.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROG.L.
Performance
ESGB.L vs. KROG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGB.L achieves a -13.64% return, which is significantly lower than KROG.L's 15.55% return.
ESGB.L
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- -13.64%
- 6M
- -17.38%
- 1Y
- -11.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- —
KROG.L
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 15.55%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 12.88%
- 3Y*
- -1.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESGB.L vs. KROG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGB.L VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD | -13.64% | 18.62% | 51.06% | 25.92% | -20.49% |
KROG.L Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 15.55% | 0.36% | -6.89% | -26.89% | -14.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGB.L and KROG.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ESGB.L and KROG.L has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGB.L vs. KROG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESGB.L
KROG.L
ESGB.L vs. KROG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGB.L | KROG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.15 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 1.52 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 3.05 | -3.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGB.L | KROG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | 0.80 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | -0.45 | +1.15 |
Drawdowns
ESGB.L vs. KROG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGB.L drawdown since its inception was -39.40%, smaller than the maximum KROG.L drawdown of -51.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGB.L and KROG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGB.L | KROG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.40% | -51.38% | +11.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.63% | -8.21% | -18.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.63% | -28.00% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.21% | -38.55% | +13.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.09% | -34.39% | +21.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.99% | 4.12% | +10.87% |
Volatility
ESGB.L vs. KROG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) is 3.96%, while Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that ESGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KROG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGB.L | KROG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 5.64% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.09% | 12.21% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.79% | 15.69% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 19.47% | +2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.81% | 19.47% | +3.34% |
ESGB.L vs. KROG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGB.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than KROG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGB.L vs. KROG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESGB.L nor KROG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGB.L and KROG.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KROG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KROG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESGB.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESGB.L and 0.50% for KROG.L.
Find the right allocation for ESGB.L and KROG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer