PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESG vs. ROUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESG vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESG achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly lower than ROUS's 16.55% return.


ESG

1D
-0.45%
1M
7.28%
YTD
12.20%
6M
13.15%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
12.73%
10Y*

ROUS

1D
0.01%
1M
6.18%
YTD
16.55%
6M
16.75%
1Y
29.42%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
13.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESG vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
12.20%16.04%20.22%27.86%-19.89%28.48%20.75%31.74%-5.17%22.78%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
16.55%15.21%17.61%15.05%-9.65%27.33%6.61%23.94%-9.59%22.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ESG and ROUS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2016

0.82

The correlation between ESG and ROUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESG vs. ROUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESG
ROUS

Technology

36.7%
33.2%

Financial Services

16.9%
10.6%

Healthcare

11.2%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
5.8%

Industrials

4.5%
10.4%

Energy

3.1%
3.0%

Basic Materials

3.0%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.7%
2.1%

Communication Services

1.0%
8.6%

Utilities

0.7%
3.8%

Technology

ESG
36.7%
ROUS
33.2%

Financial Services

ESG
16.9%
ROUS
10.6%

Healthcare

ESG
11.2%
ROUS
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ESG
10.0%
ROUS
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

ESG
9.2%
ROUS
5.8%

Industrials

ESG
4.5%
ROUS
10.4%

Energy

ESG
3.1%
ROUS
3.0%

Basic Materials

ESG
3.0%
ROUS
2.2%

Real Estate

ESG
2.7%
ROUS
2.1%

Communication Services

ESG
1.0%
ROUS
8.6%

Utilities

ESG
0.7%
ROUS
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESG vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESG
ESG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ESG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ESG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESG Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESG vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGROUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

4.95

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.02

20.38

-7.36

ESG vs. ROUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESG Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the ROUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESG and ROUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGROUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.60

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.90

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.67

+0.16

Drawdowns

ESG vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESG drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum ROUS drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESG and ROUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGROUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-35.51%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-5.97%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.32%

-15.81%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-18.91%

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

0.00%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-4.24%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.45%

+0.54%

Volatility

ESG vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) at 2.54%. This indicates that ESG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGROUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

2.54%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.46%

8.50%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.16%

11.37%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

14.38%

+2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

16.96%

+1.40%

ESG vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESG has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESG vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison

ESG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than ROUS's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
0.87%0.96%1.18%1.10%1.38%1.03%1.33%1.51%1.72%1.52%0.92%0.00%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.32%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESG and ROUS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESG has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to ROUS (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESG dropped -32.53% vs ROUS's -35.51%.

On 5-year performance, ROUS leads with 12.84% vs 12.73% for ESG. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 12.84% return vs 12.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ESG.

ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.87% for ESG.

ESG tracks STOXX USA ESG Select KPIs Index, while ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ESG and 0.19% for ROUS.

ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESG and ROUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer