PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESBG vs. RDVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESBG vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESBG achieves a -2.79% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 17.25% return.


ESBG

1D
-0.46%
1M
-2.07%
6M
-11.15%
YTD
-2.79%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

RDVY

1D
0.36%
1M
1.19%
6M
12.71%
YTD
17.25%
1Y
30.74%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
16.25%
ALL TIME*
13.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.83K$6.10K$15.77K
$77.65M$79.19M$83.63M

ESBG vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ESBG and RDVY is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESBG vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESBG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESBG vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESBGRDVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.63

ESBG vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESBG vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESBG drawdown since its inception was -18.84%, smaller than the maximum RDVY drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESBG and RDVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESBGRDVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.84%

-40.60%

+21.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.57%

0.00%

-17.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.52%

-4.95%

-3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

Volatility

ESBG vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESBGRDVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.17%

14.65%

+10.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.17%

18.92%

+6.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.17%

21.03%

+4.14%

ESBG vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESBG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESBG vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

ESBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than RDVY's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESBG
First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF
1.12%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.83%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESBG and RDVY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ESBG.

ESBG has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.83% for RDVY.

ESBG is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while RDVY is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ESBG and 0.47% for RDVY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESBG and RDVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer