PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERTH vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERTH vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERTH achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, ERTH has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 7.56%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


ERTH

1D
1.09%
1M
3.37%
YTD
9.21%
6M
10.41%
1Y
25.31%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
-3.27%
10Y*
7.56%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERTH vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERTH
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
9.21%18.47%-13.56%0.12%-27.59%2.64%51.02%36.78%-12.49%30.53%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ERTH and VOO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.76

The correlation between ERTH and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

ERTH vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ERTH
VOO

Real Estate

26.7%
1.9%

Industrials

21.0%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

14.3%
10.2%

Technology

10.5%
35.7%

Energy

8.5%
3.5%

Utilities

6.5%
2.4%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
4.9%

Financial Services

0.3%
11.6%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Real Estate

ERTH
26.7%
VOO
1.9%

Industrials

ERTH
21.0%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ERTH
14.3%
VOO
10.2%

Technology

ERTH
10.5%
VOO
35.7%

Energy

ERTH
8.5%
VOO
3.5%

Utilities

ERTH
6.5%
VOO
2.4%

Basic Materials

ERTH
2.3%
VOO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

ERTH
2.1%
VOO
4.9%

Financial Services

ERTH
0.3%
VOO
11.6%

Communication Services

ERTH

-

VOO
11.3%

Healthcare

ERTH

-

VOO
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERTH vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERTH
ERTH Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ERTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERTH Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
ERTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERTH Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERTH vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERTHVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

2.39

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

3.25

-1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.43

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.16

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.58

14.73

-6.14

ERTH vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERTH and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERTHVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

2.39

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.83

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.87

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.89

-0.68

Drawdowns

ERTH vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERTH drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERTH and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERTHVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.45%

-33.99%

-30.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-8.90%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.82%

-18.69%

-15.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.72%

-24.52%

-27.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.72%

-33.99%

-17.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.43%

-0.70%

-25.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.47%

-3.69%

-17.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

1.91%

+0.99%

Volatility

ERTH vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that ERTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERTHVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

2.84%

+2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.78%

8.90%

+2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.69%

11.80%

+4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.85%

16.81%

+6.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.62%

18.01%

+4.61%

ERTH vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERTH has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ERTH vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ERTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERTH
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
1.37%1.46%1.00%1.28%1.22%15.33%0.21%0.71%0.61%0.87%1.06%0.79%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERTH and VOO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ERTH has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERTH dropped -64.45% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 7.56% for ERTH. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 7.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ERTH.

ERTH has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

ERTH is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. ERTH tracks MSCI Global Environment Select Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ERTH and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERTH and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer