ERTH vs. SPY
ERTH (Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ERTH is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI Global Environment Select Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ERTH returned 7.36%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for SPY. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ERTH charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
ERTH vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERTH achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, ERTH has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 7.36%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.53% annualized return.
ERTH
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 13.85%
- 3Y*
- 1.43%
- 5Y*
- -5.81%
- 10Y*
- 7.36%
SPY
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
ERTH vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERTH Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF | 0.55% | 18.47% | -13.56% | 0.12% | -27.59% | 2.64% | 51.02% | 36.78% | -12.49% | 30.53% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.15% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERTH and SPY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2006 | 0.77 |
The correlation between ERTH and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ERTH vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ERTH
SPY
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
ERTH
SPY
Industrials
ERTH
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
ERTH
SPY
Technology
ERTH
SPY
Energy
ERTH
SPY
Utilities
ERTH
SPY
Basic Materials
ERTH
SPY
Consumer Defensive
ERTH
SPY
Financial Services
ERTH
SPY
Communication Services
ERTH
-
SPY
Healthcare
ERTH
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERTH vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
ERTH
SPY
ERTH vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ERTH | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.34 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 2.67 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 11.92 | -7.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ERTH vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERTH drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERTH and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERTH | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.45% | -55.19% | -9.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.07% | -8.88% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.82% | -18.76% | -15.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.72% | -24.50% | -27.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.72% | -33.72% | -18.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.26% | -3.17% | -29.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.49% | -9.04% | -12.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 1.98% | +1.16% |
Volatility
ERTH vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.87%. This indicates that ERTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERTH | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.57% | 4.87% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 9.85% | +3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.34% | 12.50% | +4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.96% | 17.15% | +5.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 17.95% | +4.61% |
ERTH vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERTH has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ERTH vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
ERTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than SPY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERTH Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF | 1.93% | 1.46% | 1.00% | 1.28% | 1.22% | 15.33% | 0.21% | 0.71% | 0.61% | 0.87% | 1.06% | 0.79% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ERTH and SPY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ERTH has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to SPY (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERTH dropped -64.45% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.53% vs 7.36% for ERTH. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.53% return vs 7.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ERTH.
ERTH has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.03% for SPY.
ERTH is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. ERTH tracks MSCI Global Environment Select Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ERTH and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ERTH and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer