ERTH vs. SMOG
ERTH (Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF) and SMOG (VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds - ERTH tracks the MSCI Global Environment Select Index while SMOG tracks the MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ERTH returned 7.36%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for SMOG. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ERTH charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for SMOG.
Performance
ERTH vs. SMOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERTH achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than SMOG's 10.83% return. Over the past 10 years, ERTH has underperformed SMOG with an annualized return of 7.36%, while SMOG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.89% annualized return.
ERTH
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 13.85%
- 3Y*
- 1.43%
- 5Y*
- -5.81%
- 10Y*
- 7.36%
SMOG
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 33.70%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- -0.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.89%
ERTH vs. SMOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERTH Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF | 0.55% | 18.47% | -13.56% | 0.12% | -27.59% | 2.64% | 51.02% | 36.78% | -12.49% | 30.53% |
SMOG VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF | 10.83% | 33.36% | -9.33% | 1.42% | -29.92% | -2.75% | 118.38% | 38.86% | -10.18% | 22.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERTH and SMOG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2007 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ERTH and SMOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
ERTH vs. SMOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ERTH
SMOG
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
ERTH
SMOG
-
Industrials
ERTH
SMOG
Consumer Cyclical
ERTH
SMOG
Technology
ERTH
SMOG
Energy
ERTH
SMOG
Utilities
ERTH
SMOG
Basic Materials
ERTH
SMOG
Consumer Defensive
ERTH
SMOG
-
Financial Services
ERTH
SMOG
Communication Services
ERTH
-
SMOG
-
Healthcare
ERTH
-
SMOG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERTH vs. SMOG — Risk / Return Rank
ERTH
SMOG
ERTH vs. SMOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) and VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ERTH | SMOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.27 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 2.99 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 9.70 | -5.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ERTH vs. SMOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERTH drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, smaller than the maximum SMOG drawdown of -84.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERTH and SMOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERTH | SMOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.45% | -84.39% | +19.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.07% | -11.32% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.82% | -28.72% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.72% | -47.86% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.72% | -51.10% | -0.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.26% | -19.91% | -12.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.49% | -52.37% | +30.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.48% | -0.34% |
Volatility
ERTH vs. SMOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) is 6.57%, while VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) has a volatility of 9.15%. This indicates that ERTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERTH | SMOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.57% | 9.15% | -2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 17.34% | -4.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.34% | 21.70% | -4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.96% | 25.36% | -2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 25.74% | -3.18% |
ERTH vs. SMOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERTH has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than SMOG's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
ERTH vs. SMOG - Dividend Comparison
ERTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than SMOG's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERTH Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF | 1.93% | 1.46% | 1.00% | 1.28% | 1.22% | 15.33% | 0.21% | 0.71% | 0.61% | 0.87% | 1.06% | 0.79% |
SMOG VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF | 1.42% | 1.57% | 1.64% | 1.58% | 1.32% | 0.44% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, ERTH and SMOG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SMOG has higher volatility (9.15%) compared to ERTH (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERTH dropped -64.45% vs SMOG's -84.39%.
On 10-year performance, SMOG leads with 12.89% vs 7.36% for ERTH. On fees, ERTH is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ERTH has been the lower-risk option at 6.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMOG has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 7.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ERTH is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for SMOG.
ERTH has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.42% for SMOG.
ERTH tracks MSCI Global Environment Select Index, while SMOG tracks MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ERTH and 0.61% for SMOG.
SMOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ERTH and SMOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer