EQWL vs. THLV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV).
EQWL and THLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EQWL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 100 Equal Weighted. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. THLV is a passively managed fund by THOR that tracks the performance of the THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2022. Both EQWL and THLV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EQWL vs. THLV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EQWL vs. THLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | -1.85% | 17.61% | 19.11% | 19.48% | 2.72% |
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 6.72% | 10.50% | 9.52% | 5.88% | 2.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQWL achieves a -1.85% return, which is significantly lower than THLV's 6.72% return.
EQWL
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- -1.85%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 14.11%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
THLV
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 7.72%
- 1Y
- 20.34%
- 3Y*
- 11.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQWL vs. THLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQWL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than THLV's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EQWL vs. THLV — Risk / Return Rank
EQWL
THLV
EQWL vs. THLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQWL | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.81 | -0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 2.53 | -1.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.34 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 3.00 | -1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.55 | 10.82 | -5.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQWL | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.81 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.85 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between EQWL and THLV is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EQWL vs. THLV - Dividend Comparison
EQWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than THLV's 1.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 1.70% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.97% | 2.12% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 2.04% | 2.23% | 1.27% | 2.01% | 2.03% |
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.25% | 2.72% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EQWL vs. THLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQWL drawdown since its inception was -49.36%, which is greater than THLV's maximum drawdown of -13.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQWL and THLV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQWL | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.36% | -13.15% | -36.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | -6.66% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.51% | -4.46% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -3.75% | -3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 1.85% | +0.66% |
Volatility
EQWL vs. THLV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) at 3.33%. This indicates that EQWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EQWL | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 3.33% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.86% | 7.61% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 11.29% | +4.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.98% | 11.80% | +3.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 11.80% | +4.98% |