EQWL vs. MTUM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EQWL (Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQWL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Equal Weight Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EQWL returned 14.47%/yr vs 17.31%/yr for MTUM. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EQWL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.

Performance

EQWL vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQWL achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return. Over the past 10 years, EQWL has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 14.47%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.31% annualized return.

EQWL

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 4.84%
• YTD: 8.74%
• 6M: 9.31%
• 1Y: 21.89%
• 3Y*: 19.67%
• 5Y*: 11.79%
• 10Y*: 14.47%

MTUM

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 15.90%
• YTD: 31.75%
• 6M: 32.38%
• 1Y: 41.76%
• 3Y*: 34.75%
• 5Y*: 15.21%
• 10Y*: 17.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQWL vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF	8.74%	17.61%	19.11%	19.48%	-11.46%	28.29%	13.94%	29.54%	-6.30%	24.41%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	31.75%	22.15%	32.89%	9.15%	-18.27%	13.36%	29.86%	27.25%	-1.67%	37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between EQWL and MTUM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2013	0.71

The correlation between EQWL and MTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EQWL vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EQWL	MTUM
Technology	22.8%	44.4%
Financial Services	15.6%	10.4%
Healthcare	14.0%	6.9%
Industrials	13.7%	15.6%
Consumer Defensive	8.9%	3.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	3.6%
Communication Services	7.6%	7.4%
Energy	3.0%	3.5%
Utilities	3.0%	1.6%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.0%	1.7%

Return for Risk

EQWL vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQWL

EQWL Risk / Return Rank: 61
EQWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
EQWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
EQWL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
EQWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
EQWL Martin Ratio Rank: 64

MTUM

MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 67
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQWL vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQWL	MTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.20	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	2.98	+0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.39	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	3.64	-0.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.94	14.50	-2.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQWL vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQWL Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQWL and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQWL	MTUM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	2.20	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.74	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	0.83	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.85	-0.25

Drawdowns

EQWL vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQWL drawdown since its inception was -49.36%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQWL and MTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQWL	MTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.36%	-34.08%	-15.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.76%	-11.54%	+3.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.95%	-20.99%	+6.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.99%	-32.28%	+9.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.30%	-34.08%	-0.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	0.00%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.70%	-6.21%	-0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	2.89%	-1.05%

Volatility

EQWL vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) is 2.66%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that EQWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQWL	MTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	7.68%	-5.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.66%	16.46%	-8.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.37%	19.04%	-8.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.98%	20.60%	-5.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.79%	21.03%	-4.24%

EQWL vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQWL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EQWL vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

EQWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF	1.54%	1.67%	1.86%	1.97%	2.12%	1.65%	2.01%	2.04%	2.23%	1.27%	2.01%	2.03%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	0.60%	0.91%	0.75%	1.35%	1.80%	0.55%	0.83%	1.48%	1.27%	1.02%	1.43%	1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQWL and MTUM in my portfolio?

EQWL and MTUM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EQWL or MTUM?

MTUM has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to EQWL (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQWL dropped -49.36% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

Which ETF is better, EQWL or MTUM?

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.31% vs 14.47% for EQWL. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EQWL has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EQWL or MTUM?

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.31% return vs 14.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQWL or MTUM?

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EQWL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EQWL or MTUM?

EQWL has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.

What is the main difference between EQWL and MTUM?

EQWL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. EQWL tracks S&P 100 Equal Weight Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EQWL and 0.15% for MTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.