EQWL vs. CNAV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EQWL (Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. EQWL is passively managed, while CNAV is actively managed. Over the past year, EQWL returned 21.89% vs 72.64% for CNAV. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EQWL charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.

Performance

EQWL vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQWL achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 47.26% return.

EQWL

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 4.84%
• YTD: 8.74%
• 6M: 9.31%
• 1Y: 21.89%
• 3Y*: 19.67%
• 5Y*: 11.79%
• 10Y*: 14.47%

CNAV

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 21.60%
• YTD: 47.26%
• 6M: 48.02%
• 1Y: 72.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQWL vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF	8.74%	17.61%	1.01%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	47.26%	16.80%	6.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EQWL and CNAV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024	0.61

The correlation between EQWL and CNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EQWL vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQWL

EQWL Risk / Return Rank: 61
EQWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
EQWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
EQWL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
EQWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
EQWL Martin Ratio Rank: 64

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 87
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQWL vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQWL	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.91	-0.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	3.62	-0.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.48	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	5.63	-2.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.94	24.09	-12.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQWL vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQWL Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the CNAV Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQWL and CNAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQWL	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	2.91	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	1.62	-1.02

Drawdowns

EQWL vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQWL drawdown since its inception was -49.36%, which is greater than CNAV's maximum drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQWL and CNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQWL	CNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.36%	-30.06%	-19.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.76%	-12.97%	+5.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	0.00%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.70%	-5.42%	-1.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	3.02%	-1.18%

Volatility

EQWL vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) is 2.66%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 12.28%. This indicates that EQWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQWL	CNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	12.28%	-9.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.66%	21.02%	-13.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.37%	25.08%	-14.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.98%	27.16%	-12.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.79%	27.16%	-10.37%

EQWL vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQWL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQWL vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

EQWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF	1.54%	1.67%	1.86%	1.97%	2.12%	1.65%	2.01%	2.04%	2.23%	1.27%	2.01%	2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQWL and CNAV in my portfolio?

EQWL and CNAV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EQWL or CNAV?

CNAV has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to EQWL (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQWL dropped -49.36% vs CNAV's -30.06%.

Which ETF is better, EQWL or CNAV?

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 72.64% vs 21.89% for EQWL. On fees, EQWL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EQWL has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EQWL or CNAV?

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 72.64% return vs 21.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQWL or CNAV?

EQWL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EQWL or CNAV?

EQWL has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

What is the main difference between EQWL and CNAV?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EQWL and 1.31% for CNAV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.