EQRR vs. RDIV
EQRR (ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF) and RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - EQRR tracks the Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index while RDIV tracks the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQRR returned 13.84%/yr vs 13.86%/yr for RDIV. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EQRR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RDIV.
Performance
EQRR vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQRR achieves a 29.00% return, which is significantly higher than RDIV's 22.74% return.
EQRR
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- 6M
- 23.60%
- YTD
- 29.00%
- 1Y
- 40.33%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.68%
RDIV
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- 22.74%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $235.70K | $533.46K | $2.90M | |
| $3.34M | $2.84M | $4.35M |
EQRR vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 29.00% | 15.49% | 7.69% | 9.19% | 2.20% | 36.11% | -10.14% | 19.57% | -18.60% | 17.11% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 22.74% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 29.12% | -9.31% | 22.62% | -4.78% | 12.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQRR and RDIV is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2017 | 0.66 |
The correlation between EQRR and RDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EQRR vs. RDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQRR
RDIV
Technology
Energy
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
EQRR
RDIV
Energy
EQRR
RDIV
Financial Services
EQRR
RDIV
Communication Services
EQRR
RDIV
Industrials
EQRR
RDIV
-
Consumer Cyclical
EQRR
RDIV
Basic Materials
EQRR
-
RDIV
Consumer Defensive
EQRR
-
RDIV
Healthcare
EQRR
-
RDIV
Real Estate
EQRR
-
RDIV
Utilities
EQRR
-
RDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQRR vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank
EQRR
RDIV
EQRR vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EQRR | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.45 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.73 | 7.24 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.43 | 22.00 | +4.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EQRR vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQRR drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, which is greater than RDIV's maximum drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQRR and RDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQRR | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.93% | -49.97% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.95% | -4.84% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.75% | -17.91% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.75% | -24.89% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.46% | +1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.93% | -5.80% | -4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 1.59% | -0.14% |
Volatility
EQRR vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) is 3.47%, while Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that EQRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQRR | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 4.00% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.86% | 9.25% | +2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.98% | 13.49% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 17.41% | +3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.77% | 21.85% | +2.92% |
EQRR vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQRR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQRR vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison
EQRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than RDIV's 3.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 1.07% | 1.70% | 2.17% | 2.77% | 2.34% | 1.71% | 2.17% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.45% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQRR and RDIV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDIV has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to EQRR (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQRR dropped -57.93% vs RDIV's -49.97%.
On 5-year performance, RDIV leads with 13.86% vs 13.84% for EQRR. On fees, EQRR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EQRR has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 13.86% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQRR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 1.07% for EQRR.
EQRR tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index, while RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQRR and 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQRR and RDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer