EQRR vs. AUSF
EQRR (ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF) and AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - EQRR tracks the Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index while AUSF tracks the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQRR returned 12.35%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for AUSF. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EQRR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for AUSF.
Performance
EQRR vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQRR achieves a 28.07% return, which is significantly higher than AUSF's 6.72% return.
EQRR
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- 9.12%
- YTD
- 28.07%
- 6M
- 29.12%
- 1Y
- 44.10%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- —
AUSF
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 15.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- —
EQRR vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 28.07% | 15.49% | 7.69% | 9.19% | 2.20% | 36.11% | -10.14% | 19.57% | -25.81% |
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 6.72% | 13.69% | 16.05% | 22.26% | -0.18% | 27.48% | 1.27% | 24.06% | -10.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQRR and AUSF is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018 | 0.67 |
The correlation between EQRR and AUSF shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.74 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EQRR vs. AUSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQRR
AUSF
Technology
Energy
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
EQRR
AUSF
Energy
EQRR
AUSF
Financial Services
EQRR
AUSF
Communication Services
EQRR
AUSF
Consumer Cyclical
EQRR
AUSF
Industrials
EQRR
AUSF
Basic Materials
EQRR
-
AUSF
Consumer Defensive
EQRR
-
AUSF
Healthcare
EQRR
-
AUSF
Real Estate
EQRR
-
AUSF
Utilities
EQRR
-
AUSF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQRR vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank
EQRR
AUSF
EQRR vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQRR | AUSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.29 | 1.50 | +1.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.30 | 2.18 | +2.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.26 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.04 | 2.60 | +6.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.66 | 7.54 | +26.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQRR | AUSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29 | 1.50 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.94 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.65 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
EQRR vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQRR drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, which is greater than AUSF's maximum drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQRR and AUSF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQRR | AUSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.93% | -44.25% | -13.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.95% | -5.84% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.75% | -12.29% | -5.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.75% | -14.23% | -7.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.26% | +2.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.08% | -4.22% | -5.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | 2.01% | -0.68% |
Volatility
EQRR vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) at 2.41%. This indicates that EQRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQRR | AUSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 2.41% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.32% | 6.65% | +3.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.49% | 10.14% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 13.65% | +7.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 19.07% | +5.80% |
EQRR vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQRR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQRR vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison
EQRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than AUSF's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 2.76% | 2.78% | 2.63% | 1.83% | 2.51% | 2.22% | 2.95% | 4.02% | 1.46% | 0.00% |
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 1.20% | 1.70% | 2.17% | 2.77% | 2.34% | 1.71% | 2.17% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQRR and AUSF have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQRR has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to AUSF (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQRR dropped -57.93% vs AUSF's -44.25%.
On 5-year performance, AUSF leads with 12.71% vs 12.35% for EQRR. On fees, AUSF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AUSF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQRR.
AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.20% for EQRR.
EQRR tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index, while AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQRR and 0.27% for AUSF.
EQRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQRR and AUSF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer