EQPGX vs. FHCIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I (FHCIX).
EQPGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 22, 1983. FHCIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Performance
EQPGX vs. FHCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EQPGX vs. FHCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQPGX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I | -9.32% | 14.60% | 29.99% | 35.60% | -24.45% | 22.94% | 43.80% | 34.01% | 0.17% | 35.19% |
FHCIX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I | -9.59% | 14.48% | 4.22% | 4.07% | -12.84% | 11.53% | 21.40% | 28.22% | 7.51% | 24.38% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EQPGX having a -9.32% return and FHCIX slightly lower at -9.59%. Over the past 10 years, EQPGX has outperformed FHCIX with an annualized return of 16.55%, while FHCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.60% annualized return.
EQPGX
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -9.01%
- YTD
- -9.32%
- 6M
- -8.58%
- 1Y
- 13.29%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 16.55%
FHCIX
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -9.50%
- YTD
- -9.59%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQPGX vs. FHCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EQPGX and FHCIX have an expense ratio of 0.71%.
Return for Risk
EQPGX vs. FHCIX — Risk / Return Rank
EQPGX
FHCIX
EQPGX vs. FHCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I (FHCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQPGX | FHCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 0.22 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.01 | 0.44 | +0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.05 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 0.23 | +0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.91 | 0.69 | +2.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQPGX | FHCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.22 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.08 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.46 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.57 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between EQPGX and FHCIX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EQPGX vs. FHCIX - Dividend Comparison
EQPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than FHCIX's 12.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQPGX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I | 0.58% | 0.52% | 10.64% | 0.48% | 1.96% | 11.42% | 10.84% | 8.56% | 6.43% | 11.57% | 5.90% | 2.21% |
FHCIX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I | 12.78% | 11.56% | 10.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.64% | 5.72% | 0.48% | 4.65% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 6.29% |
Drawdowns
EQPGX vs. FHCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQPGX drawdown since its inception was -62.00%, which is greater than FHCIX's maximum drawdown of -44.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQPGX and FHCIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQPGX | FHCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.00% | -44.75% | -17.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.80% | -13.37% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.81% | -29.24% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.11% | -29.24% | -1.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.57% | -13.37% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.80% | -9.20% | -4.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 4.39% | -0.80% |
Volatility
EQPGX vs. FHCIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I (FHCIX) at 5.59%. This indicates that EQPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EQPGX | FHCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 5.59% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.62% | 10.99% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.46% | 18.39% | +3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.08% | 17.69% | +2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.45% | 18.75% | +1.70% |