EQPGX vs. VOO

In the year-to-date period, EQPGX achieves a -1.33% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -0.22% return. Over the past 10 years, EQPGX has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 15.85%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.59% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

EQPGX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EQPGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQPGX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EQPGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%.

The maximum EQPGX drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQPGX and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.80%. This indicates that EQPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.