PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQPGX vs. PDRDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQPGX vs. PDRDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) and Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund (PDRDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQPGX achieves a 14.96% return, which is significantly higher than PDRDX's 11.85% return. Over the past 10 years, EQPGX has outperformed PDRDX with an annualized return of 19.14%, while PDRDX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.34% annualized return.


EQPGX

1D
0.69%
1M
6.92%
YTD
14.96%
6M
14.35%
1Y
31.12%
3Y*
25.11%
5Y*
14.62%
10Y*
19.14%

PDRDX

1D
-0.51%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
11.85%
6M
12.60%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
5.96%
10Y*
6.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQPGX vs. PDRDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQPGX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I
14.96%14.60%29.99%35.60%-24.45%22.94%43.80%34.01%0.17%35.19%
PDRDX
Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund
11.85%14.63%3.09%3.22%-6.19%17.30%3.97%15.02%-7.90%10.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EQPGX and PDRDX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2010

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between EQPGX and PDRDX has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQPGX vs. PDRDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQPGX
EQPGX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
EQPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
EQPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

PDRDX
PDRDX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PDRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PDRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQPGX vs. PDRDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) and Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund (PDRDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQPGXPDRDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.97

2.38

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

3.25

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.45

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

3.70

-1.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.63

16.11

-6.48

EQPGX vs. PDRDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the PDRDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQPGX and PDRDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQPGXPDRDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.38

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.55

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.59

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.50

+0.11

Drawdowns

EQPGX vs. PDRDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQPGX drawdown since its inception was -62.00%, which is greater than PDRDX's maximum drawdown of -28.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQPGX and PDRDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQPGXPDRDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.00%

-28.55%

-33.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.57%

-5.88%

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.04%

-10.94%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

-19.35%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.11%

-28.55%

-2.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.57%

+2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.75%

-5.98%

-7.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

1.35%

+1.94%

Volatility

EQPGX vs. PDRDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund (PDRDX) at 2.71%. This indicates that EQPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDRDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQPGXPDRDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

2.71%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.70%

7.63%

+5.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.32%

9.12%

+7.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.19%

10.99%

+9.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.56%

10.80%

+9.76%

EQPGX vs. PDRDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQPGX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than PDRDX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQPGX vs. PDRDX - Dividend Comparison

EQPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than PDRDX's 3.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQPGX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I
0.45%0.52%10.64%0.48%1.96%11.42%10.84%8.56%6.43%11.57%5.90%2.21%
PDRDX
Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund
3.84%4.19%2.43%2.52%12.88%6.56%0.52%2.36%3.47%2.21%2.61%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQPGX and PDRDX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EQPGX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to PDRDX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQPGX dropped -62.00% vs PDRDX's -28.55%.

PDRDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQPGX and PDRDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer