PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHCIX vs. FHLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHCIX vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I (FHCIX) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHCIX achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly higher than FHLC's 6.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FHCIX having a 9.42% annualized return and FHLC not far ahead at 9.77%.


FHCIX

1D
-1.74%
1M
-2.97%
6M
7.78%
YTD
8.74%
1Y
30.44%
3Y*
9.52%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
9.42%
ALL TIME*
11.32%

FHLC

1D
-0.04%
1M
-1.19%
6M
6.28%
YTD
6.71%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
4.81%
10Y*
9.77%
ALL TIME*
10.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$13.38M$17.91M$16.14M

FHCIX vs. FHLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHCIX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I
8.74%14.48%4.22%4.07%-12.84%11.53%21.40%28.22%7.51%24.38%
FHLC
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF
6.71%15.42%2.48%2.58%-5.55%20.39%18.13%21.94%4.71%23.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FHCIX and FHLC is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.91

The correlation between FHCIX and FHLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHCIX vs. FHLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHCIX
FHCIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FHCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FHCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLC
FHLC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FHLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLC Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHCIX vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I (FHCIX) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHCIXFHLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.70

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

6.71

-0.81

FHCIX vs. FHLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the FHLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHCIX and FHLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHCIX vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHCIX drawdown since its inception was -44.75%, which is greater than FHLC's maximum drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHCIX and FHLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHCIXFHLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.75%

-28.76%

-15.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.37%

-10.38%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.38%

-16.87%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-17.73%

-11.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.24%

-28.76%

-0.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.18%

-2.81%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-5.16%

-4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.08%

4.16%

+0.92%

Volatility

FHCIX vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I (FHCIX) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) at 4.94%. This indicates that FHCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHCIXFHLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

4.94%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

11.69%

+1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.07%

15.17%

+1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

15.25%

+2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.82%

16.90%

+1.92%

FHCIX vs. FHLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHCIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHCIX vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison

FHCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.63%, more than FHLC's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHCIX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I
10.63%11.56%10.92%0.00%0.00%5.64%5.72%0.48%4.65%0.06%0.00%6.29%
FHLC
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF
1.30%1.40%1.51%1.40%1.30%1.16%1.45%1.18%1.38%1.38%1.40%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHCIX and FHLC have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHCIX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to FHLC (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHCIX dropped -44.75% vs FHLC's -28.76%.

FHLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHCIX and FHLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer