FHCIX vs. PRGTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I (FHCIX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX).
FHCIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. PRGTX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 28, 2000.
Performance
FHCIX vs. PRGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHCIX vs. PRGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHCIX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I | -9.59% | 14.48% | 4.22% | 4.07% | -12.84% | 11.53% | 21.40% | 28.22% | 7.51% | 24.38% |
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund | -7.19% | 27.28% | 33.12% | 55.92% | -55.53% | 8.85% | 75.77% | 34.22% | -10.07% | 47.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHCIX achieves a -9.59% return, which is significantly lower than PRGTX's -7.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FHCIX has underperformed PRGTX with an annualized return of 8.60%, while PRGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.10% annualized return.
FHCIX
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -9.50%
- YTD
- -9.59%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
PRGTX
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -9.81%
- YTD
- -7.19%
- 6M
- -5.41%
- 1Y
- 32.83%
- 3Y*
- 25.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHCIX vs. PRGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHCIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than PRGTX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FHCIX vs. PRGTX — Risk / Return Rank
FHCIX
PRGTX
FHCIX vs. PRGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I (FHCIX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHCIX | PRGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.22 | 1.16 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.44 | 1.72 | -1.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.24 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 2.06 | -1.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.69 | 6.49 | -5.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHCIX | PRGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 1.16 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.11 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.54 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.40 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHCIX and PRGTX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FHCIX vs. PRGTX - Dividend Comparison
FHCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.78%, while PRGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHCIX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I | 12.78% | 11.56% | 10.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.64% | 5.72% | 0.48% | 4.65% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 6.29% |
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.28% | 27.71% | 5.05% | 0.15% | 24.67% | 15.81% | 9.46% | 10.03% |
Drawdowns
FHCIX vs. PRGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHCIX drawdown since its inception was -44.75%, smaller than the maximum PRGTX drawdown of -71.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHCIX and PRGTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHCIX | PRGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.75% | -71.18% | +26.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.37% | -13.95% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -65.29% | +36.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.24% | -65.29% | +36.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.37% | -13.06% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -21.68% | +12.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 4.44% | -0.05% |
Volatility
FHCIX vs. PRGTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class I (FHCIX) is 5.59%, while T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) has a volatility of 8.97%. This indicates that FHCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHCIX | PRGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 8.97% | -3.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 17.69% | -6.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.39% | 27.78% | -9.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 31.74% | -14.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.75% | 28.17% | -9.42% |