EQPGX vs. TRRDX

In the year-to-date period, EQPGX achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly higher than TRRDX's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, EQPGX has outperformed TRRDX with an annualized return of 9.63%, while TRRDX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.39% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

EQPGX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than TRRDX's 0.61% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund (TRRDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EQPGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the TRRDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQPGX and TRRDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EQPGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRRDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%.

The maximum EQPGX drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, which is greater than TRRDX's maximum drawdown of -56.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQPGX and TRRDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) has a higher volatility of 11.01% compared to T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund (TRRDX) at 3.63%. This indicates that EQPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRRDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.