EPV vs. QLD

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

EPV (ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - EPV tracks the FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%) while QLD tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPV returned -22.51%/yr vs 34.28%/yr for QLD. At a correlation of -0.67, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

EPV vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPV achieves a -13.88% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 28.12% return. Over the past 10 years, EPV has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of -22.51%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 34.28% annualized return.

EPV

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: 1.66%
• 6M: -8.73%
• YTD: -13.88%
• 1Y: -25.33%
• 3Y*: -22.94%
• 5Y*: -18.56%
• 10Y*: -22.51%

QLD

• 1D: -3.81%
• 1M: -3.42%
• 6M: 23.12%
• YTD: 28.12%
• 1Y: 52.34%
• 3Y*: 39.12%
• 5Y*: 19.39%
• 10Y*: 34.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPV vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe	-13.88%	-45.21%	2.02%	-30.81%	15.53%	-31.62%	-37.31%	-36.11%	32.22%	-39.79%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	28.12%	30.36%	42.82%	117.72%	-60.52%	54.67%	88.90%	81.69%	-8.31%	70.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EPV and QLD is -0.63, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2009	-0.67

The correlation between EPV and QLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.67 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPV vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EPV	QLD
Financial Services	44.2%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Communication Services	-	14.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.4%
Energy	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Industrials	-	2.6%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	58.7%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

EPV vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPV

EPV Risk / Return Rank: 3
EPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
EPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
EPV Omega Ratio Rank: 3
EPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EPV Martin Ratio Rank: 3

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 50
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 48
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPV vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPV	QLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.79	1.42	-2.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.01	1.90	-2.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.25	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	2.09	-2.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.24	6.85	-8.09

EPV vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPV Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPV and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPV vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPV drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPV and QLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPV	QLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.40%	-83.13%	-16.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.63%	-25.13%	-8.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.78%	-42.29%	-24.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-79.99%	-63.68%	-16.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-92.86%	-63.68%	-29.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.37%	-10.29%	-89.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.43%	-18.11%	-70.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.48%	7.66%	+12.82%

Volatility

EPV vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) is 10.05%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 17.17%. This indicates that EPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPV	QLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.05%	17.17%	-7.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.90%	30.63%	-2.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.23%	37.07%	-4.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.93%	45.56%	-9.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.84%	44.86%	-8.02%

EPV vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EPV and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

EPV vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

EPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than QLD's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe	4.64%	4.80%	4.83%	3.17%	0.33%	0.01%	0.09%	1.10%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.13%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPV and QLD in my portfolio?

EPV and QLD have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPV or QLD?

QLD has higher volatility (17.17%) compared to EPV (10.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPV dropped -99.40% vs QLD's -83.13%.

Which ETF is better, EPV or QLD?

On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 34.28% vs -22.51% for EPV. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EPV has been the lower-risk option at 10.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPV or QLD?

Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 34.28% return vs -22.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPV or QLD?

EPV and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPV or QLD?

EPV has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.

What is the main difference between EPV and QLD?

EPV tracks FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.