EPSYX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund (EPSYX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
EPSYX is managed by New York Life. It was launched on Dec 26, 2005. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
EPSYX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EPSYX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPSYX MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund | 4.17% | 22.09% | 15.38% | 12.50% | -5.37% | 17.40% | -1.38% | 23.19% | -9.23% | 16.31% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPSYX achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EPSYX having a 9.14% annualized return and FGIAX not far behind at 8.78%.
EPSYX
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- YTD
- 4.17%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- 22.62%
- 3Y*
- 17.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EPSYX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPSYX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EPSYX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
EPSYX
FGIAX
EPSYX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund (EPSYX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPSYX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 1.79 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 2.30 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 2.73 | -0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.60 | 12.62 | -3.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPSYX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.79 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.80 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.58 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.42 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between EPSYX and FGIAX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EPSYX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
EPSYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, less than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPSYX MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund | 7.07% | 8.24% | 10.13% | 2.71% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 2.74% | 6.87% | 9.87% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 9.65% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
EPSYX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPSYX drawdown since its inception was -48.92%, roughly equal to the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPSYX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPSYX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.92% | -49.35% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.78% | -8.29% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.92% | -21.08% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.35% | -38.02% | +1.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.68% | -3.06% | -2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -7.22% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 1.79% | +0.53% |
Volatility
EPSYX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund (EPSYX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) have volatilities of 4.17% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EPSYX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 4.15% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 7.07% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.90% | 12.28% | +1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.99% | 13.08% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 15.17% | -0.32% |