PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPS vs. ILCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPS vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EPS having a 11.42% return and ILCB slightly lower at 11.12%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EPS having a 14.89% annualized return and ILCB not far ahead at 15.00%.


EPS

1D
-0.81%
1M
4.89%
YTD
11.42%
6M
11.50%
1Y
29.14%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
14.89%

ILCB

1D
-0.67%
1M
5.29%
YTD
11.12%
6M
11.10%
1Y
28.03%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
15.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPS vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPS
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund
11.42%17.40%23.97%22.81%-15.82%27.47%12.02%32.54%-7.52%22.73%
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
11.12%17.70%24.96%26.91%-19.48%24.07%19.40%32.68%-8.51%22.09%

Correlation

The correlation between EPS and ILCB is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2007

0.92

The correlation between EPS and ILCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPS vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPS
ILCB

Technology

32.5%
35.5%

Financial Services

15.4%
11.7%

Communication Services

13.4%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
10.1%

Healthcare

9.5%
8.6%

Industrials

5.4%
8.6%

Energy

4.4%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.8%

Utilities

2.1%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.3%
1.8%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.8%

Technology

EPS
32.5%
ILCB
35.5%

Financial Services

EPS
15.4%
ILCB
11.7%

Communication Services

EPS
13.4%
ILCB
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EPS
10.9%
ILCB
10.1%

Healthcare

EPS
9.5%
ILCB
8.6%

Industrials

EPS
5.4%
ILCB
8.6%

Energy

EPS
4.4%
ILCB
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

EPS
4.3%
ILCB
4.8%

Utilities

EPS
2.1%
ILCB
2.3%

Basic Materials

EPS
1.3%
ILCB
1.8%

Real Estate

EPS
0.9%
ILCB
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPS vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPS
EPS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCB
ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPS vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPSILCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.42

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

3.10

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.29

14.24

+2.05

EPS vs. ILCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPS Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the ILCB Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPS and ILCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPSILCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.35

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.79

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.83

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.64

-0.08

Drawdowns

EPS vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPS drawdown since its inception was -54.43%, which is greater than ILCB's maximum drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPS and ILCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPSILCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.43%

-51.53%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-9.09%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.65%

-19.05%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

-25.47%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.79%

-35.30%

-0.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.67%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-6.24%

-1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

1.97%

-0.18%

Volatility

EPS vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) have volatilities of 2.79% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPSILCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.88%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.77%

9.10%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

12.02%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

17.13%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.65%

18.16%

-0.51%

EPS vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EPS vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison

EPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than ILCB's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPS
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund
1.14%1.26%1.47%1.73%1.95%1.51%1.85%1.70%2.02%1.59%1.99%2.15%
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
0.97%1.11%1.19%1.43%1.65%1.16%1.26%2.25%2.17%1.81%1.97%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, EPS and ILCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ILCB has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to EPS (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPS dropped -54.43% vs ILCB's -51.53%.

On 10-year performance, ILCB leads with 15.00% vs 14.89% for EPS. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 15.00% return vs 14.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for EPS.

EPS has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.97% for ILCB.

EPS tracks WisdomTree U.S. Large Cap Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for EPS and 0.03% for ILCB.

EPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPS and ILCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer