PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPRF vs. SPFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPRF vs. SPFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPRF achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly lower than SPFF's 6.91% return.


EPRF

1D
-0.41%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
-2.39%
6M
-2.28%
1Y
2.04%
3Y*
2.39%
5Y*
-1.97%
10Y*

SPFF

1D
-0.20%
1M
3.90%
YTD
6.91%
6M
8.28%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
3.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPRF vs. SPFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPRF
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF
-2.39%2.69%3.46%9.43%-20.68%1.37%7.38%19.54%-5.58%-0.31%
SPFF
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
6.91%7.52%8.62%3.00%-14.29%5.15%6.91%13.04%-2.55%-1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between EPRF and SPFF is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2017

0.70

The correlation between EPRF and SPFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPRF vs. SPFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPRF
SPFF

Financial Services

55.9%
54.4%

Real Estate

7.6%
2.1%

Basic Materials

-

2.6%

Communication Services

-

2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

3.2%

Industrials

-

1.8%

Technology

-

18.3%

Utilities

-

14.2%

Financial Services

EPRF
55.9%
SPFF
54.4%

Real Estate

EPRF
7.6%
SPFF
2.1%

Basic Materials

EPRF

-

SPFF
2.6%

Communication Services

EPRF

-

SPFF
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EPRF

-

SPFF
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

EPRF

-

SPFF

-

Energy

EPRF

-

SPFF

-

Healthcare

EPRF

-

SPFF
3.2%

Industrials

EPRF

-

SPFF
1.8%

Technology

EPRF

-

SPFF
18.3%

Utilities

EPRF

-

SPFF
14.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPRF vs. SPFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPRF
EPRF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
EPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
EPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

SPFF
SPFF Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SPFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPFF Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SPFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPFF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPRF vs. SPFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPRFSPFFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

1.96

-1.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.44

2.79

-2.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.34

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

2.45

-2.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.51

7.46

-6.95

EPRF vs. SPFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPRF Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the SPFF Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPRF and SPFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPRFSPFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

1.96

-1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.20

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.30

-0.22

Drawdowns

EPRF vs. SPFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum SPFF drawdown of -35.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and SPFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPRFSPFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.82%

-35.92%

+9.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-7.58%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.29%

-12.51%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.23%

-22.88%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.06%

-0.20%

-10.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-4.06%

-3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

2.49%

+1.52%

Volatility

EPRF vs. SPFF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) is 2.14%, while Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that EPRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPRFSPFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

2.97%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.46%

7.29%

-1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.55%

9.53%

-1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.81%

10.93%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.49%

13.51%

-0.02%

EPRF vs. SPFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than SPFF's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPRF vs. SPFF - Dividend Comparison

EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, less than SPFF's 6.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPRF
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF
6.18%6.03%6.13%5.71%5.67%4.70%4.92%5.01%5.27%2.59%0.00%0.00%
SPFF
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
6.34%6.47%6.39%6.64%7.15%5.78%5.75%5.97%7.60%7.24%7.04%7.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPRF and SPFF have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPFF has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to EPRF (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPRF dropped -26.82% vs SPFF's -35.92%.

On 5-year performance, SPFF leads with 2.16% vs -1.97% for EPRF. On fees, EPRF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, EPRF has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPFF has performed better with a 2.16% return vs -1.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPRF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SPFF.

SPFF has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 6.18% for EPRF.

EPRF tracks S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index, while SPFF tracks S&P Enhanced Yield North American Preferred Stock Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EPRF and 0.58% for SPFF.

SPFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPRF and SPFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer