EPRF vs. SPFF
EPRF (Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF) and SPFF (Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds - EPRF tracks the S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index while SPFF tracks the S&P Enhanced Yield North American Preferred Stock Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPRF returned -1.97%/yr vs 2.16%/yr for SPFF. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPRF charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for SPFF.
Performance
EPRF vs. SPFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPRF achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly lower than SPFF's 6.91% return.
EPRF
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- -2.39%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 2.04%
- 3Y*
- 2.39%
- 5Y*
- -1.97%
- 10Y*
- —
SPFF
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 6M
- 8.28%
- 1Y
- 18.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
EPRF vs. SPFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | -2.39% | 2.69% | 3.46% | 9.43% | -20.68% | 1.37% | 7.38% | 19.54% | -5.58% | -0.31% |
SPFF Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF | 6.91% | 7.52% | 8.62% | 3.00% | -14.29% | 5.15% | 6.91% | 13.04% | -2.55% | -1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPRF and SPFF is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2017 | 0.70 |
The correlation between EPRF and SPFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPRF vs. SPFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPRF
SPFF
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EPRF
SPFF
Real Estate
EPRF
SPFF
Basic Materials
EPRF
-
SPFF
Communication Services
EPRF
-
SPFF
Consumer Cyclical
EPRF
-
SPFF
Consumer Defensive
EPRF
-
SPFF
-
Energy
EPRF
-
SPFF
-
Healthcare
EPRF
-
SPFF
Industrials
EPRF
-
SPFF
Technology
EPRF
-
SPFF
Utilities
EPRF
-
SPFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPRF vs. SPFF — Risk / Return Rank
EPRF
SPFF
EPRF vs. SPFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPRF | SPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | 1.96 | -1.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.44 | 2.79 | -2.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.34 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 2.45 | -2.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.51 | 7.46 | -6.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPRF | SPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 1.96 | -1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.20 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.30 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
EPRF vs. SPFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum SPFF drawdown of -35.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and SPFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPRF | SPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.82% | -35.92% | +9.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.59% | -7.58% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | -12.51% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.23% | -22.88% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.06% | -0.20% | -10.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -4.06% | -3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 2.49% | +1.52% |
Volatility
EPRF vs. SPFF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) is 2.14%, while Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that EPRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPRF | SPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 2.97% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.46% | 7.29% | -1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.55% | 9.53% | -1.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 10.93% | +0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.49% | 13.51% | -0.02% |
EPRF vs. SPFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than SPFF's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPRF vs. SPFF - Dividend Comparison
EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, less than SPFF's 6.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | 6.18% | 6.03% | 6.13% | 5.71% | 5.67% | 4.70% | 4.92% | 5.01% | 5.27% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPFF Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF | 6.34% | 6.47% | 6.39% | 6.64% | 7.15% | 5.78% | 5.75% | 5.97% | 7.60% | 7.24% | 7.04% | 7.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPRF and SPFF have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPFF has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to EPRF (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPRF dropped -26.82% vs SPFF's -35.92%.
On 5-year performance, SPFF leads with 2.16% vs -1.97% for EPRF. On fees, EPRF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, EPRF has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPFF has performed better with a 2.16% return vs -1.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPRF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SPFF.
SPFF has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 6.18% for EPRF.
EPRF tracks S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index, while SPFF tracks S&P Enhanced Yield North American Preferred Stock Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EPRF and 0.58% for SPFF.
SPFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPRF and SPFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer