PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPFF vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPFF vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPFF achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SPFF has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 2.75%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.76% annualized return.


SPFF

1D
0.21%
1M
1.07%
6M
2.74%
YTD
4.06%
1Y
10.03%
3Y*
7.95%
5Y*
1.40%
10Y*
2.75%
ALL TIME*
3.19%

SCHD

1D
0.18%
1M
3.33%
6M
14.09%
YTD
24.03%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$786.88M$715.86M$685.58M
$461.72K$400.05K$611.33K

SPFF vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPFF
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
4.06%7.52%8.62%3.00%-14.29%5.15%6.91%13.04%-2.55%1.80%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.03%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SPFF and SCHD is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2012

0.41

The correlation between SPFF and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPFF vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPFF
SPFF Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SPFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPFF Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SPFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPFF Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPFF vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPFFSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.51

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

6.74

-5.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.53

17.01

-13.49

SPFF vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPFF Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPFF and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPFF vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPFF drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFF and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPFFSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.92%

-33.37%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-4.61%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.51%

-16.13%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.88%

-16.85%

-6.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.92%

-33.37%

-2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-1.24%

-1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-3.30%

-0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

1.82%

+0.92%

Volatility

SPFF vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) is 3.19%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that SPFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPFFSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

4.11%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.98%

8.11%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.06%

11.13%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.11%

14.39%

-3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.55%

16.72%

-3.17%

SPFF vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPFF has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPFF vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

SPFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, more than SCHD's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.13%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
SPFF
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
6.10%6.47%6.39%6.64%7.15%5.78%5.75%5.97%7.60%7.24%7.04%7.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPFF and SCHD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to SPFF (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPFF dropped -35.92% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.76% vs 2.75% for SPFF. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SPFF has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 2.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SPFF.

SPFF has the higher dividend yield at 6.10%, compared with 3.13% for SCHD.

SPFF is categorized as Preferred Stock, while SCHD is Dividend. SPFF tracks S&P Enhanced Yield North American Preferred Stock Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SPFF and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPFF and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer