EPRF vs. PFXF
EPRF (Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF) and PFXF (VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds - EPRF tracks the S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index while PFXF tracks the ICE Exchange-Listed Fixed & Adjustable Rate Non-Financial Preferred Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPRF returned -2.02%/yr vs 3.06%/yr for PFXF. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPRF charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for PFXF.
Performance
EPRF vs. PFXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPRF achieves a -2.15% return, which is significantly lower than PFXF's 2.05% return.
EPRF
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- 6M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- -2.15%
- 1Y
- -1.05%
- 3Y*
- 3.16%
- 5Y*
- -2.02%
- 10Y*
- —
PFXF
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -4.76%
- 6M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 6.91%
- 3Y*
- 7.98%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 4.53%
EPRF vs. PFXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | -2.15% | 2.69% | 3.46% | 9.43% | -20.68% | 1.37% | 7.38% | 19.54% | -5.58% | -0.39% |
PFXF VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF | 2.05% | 9.64% | 8.42% | 11.20% | -18.83% | 11.61% | 7.61% | 20.52% | -4.17% | 0.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPRF and PFXF is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2017 | 0.69 |
The correlation between EPRF and PFXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPRF vs. PFXF — Risk / Return Rank
EPRF
PFXF
EPRF vs. PFXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPRF | PFXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.13 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 1.01 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 3.03 | -3.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPRF vs. PFXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum PFXF drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and PFXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPRF | PFXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.82% | -35.49% | +8.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.59% | -6.87% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | -11.90% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.23% | -21.80% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.84% | -6.87% | -3.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.42% | -3.91% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 2.28% | +2.33% |
Volatility
EPRF vs. PFXF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) is 2.31%, while VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that EPRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPRF | PFXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 3.41% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.57% | 7.72% | -2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.45% | 9.64% | -2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.85% | 11.07% | +0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 13.27% | +0.15% |
EPRF vs. PFXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PFXF's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPRF vs. PFXF - Dividend Comparison
EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, less than PFXF's 6.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | 6.17% | 6.03% | 6.13% | 5.71% | 5.67% | 4.70% | 4.92% | 5.01% | 5.27% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFXF VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF | 6.57% | 6.72% | 7.82% | 7.88% | 6.74% | 4.66% | 5.19% | 5.35% | 6.56% | 5.93% | 5.81% | 5.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPRF and PFXF have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFXF has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to EPRF (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPRF dropped -26.82% vs PFXF's -35.49%.
On 5-year performance, PFXF leads with 3.06% vs -2.02% for EPRF. On fees, PFXF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, EPRF has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PFXF has performed better with a 3.06% return vs -2.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFXF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for EPRF.
PFXF has the higher dividend yield at 6.57%, compared with 6.17% for EPRF.
EPRF tracks S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index, while PFXF tracks ICE Exchange-Listed Fixed & Adjustable Rate Non-Financial Preferred Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EPRF and 0.40% for PFXF.
PFXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPRF and PFXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer