PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPRF vs. PFXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPRF vs. PFXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPRF achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly lower than PFXF's 8.54% return.


EPRF

1D
-0.41%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
-2.39%
6M
-2.28%
1Y
2.04%
3Y*
2.39%
5Y*
-1.97%
10Y*

PFXF

1D
-0.95%
1M
2.21%
YTD
8.54%
6M
9.54%
1Y
18.28%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
5.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPRF vs. PFXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPRF
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF
-2.39%2.69%3.46%9.43%-20.68%1.37%7.38%19.54%-5.58%-0.31%
PFXF
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
8.54%9.64%8.42%11.20%-18.83%11.61%7.61%20.52%-4.17%0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EPRF and PFXF is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2017

0.69

The correlation between EPRF and PFXF shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EPRF vs. PFXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPRF
PFXF

Financial Services

55.9%
6.2%

Real Estate

7.6%
14.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.9%

Energy

-

0.4%

Healthcare

-

3.0%

Industrials

-

1.0%

Technology

-

9.7%

Utilities

-

12.4%

Financial Services

EPRF
55.9%
PFXF
6.2%

Real Estate

EPRF
7.6%
PFXF
14.0%

Basic Materials

EPRF

-

PFXF

-

Communication Services

EPRF

-

PFXF
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EPRF

-

PFXF
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

EPRF

-

PFXF
2.9%

Energy

EPRF

-

PFXF
0.4%

Healthcare

EPRF

-

PFXF
3.0%

Industrials

EPRF

-

PFXF
1.0%

Technology

EPRF

-

PFXF
9.7%

Utilities

EPRF

-

PFXF
12.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPRF vs. PFXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPRF
EPRF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
EPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
EPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

PFXF
PFXF Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PFXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFXF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PFXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFXF Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPRF vs. PFXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPRFPFXFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

2.06

-1.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.44

2.98

-2.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.37

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

3.15

-2.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.51

11.08

-10.57

EPRF vs. PFXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPRF Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the PFXF Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPRF and PFXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPRFPFXFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

2.06

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.41

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.49

-0.40

Drawdowns

EPRF vs. PFXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum PFXF drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and PFXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPRFPFXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.82%

-35.49%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-5.83%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.29%

-11.90%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.23%

-21.80%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.06%

-0.95%

-10.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-3.91%

-3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

1.65%

+2.36%

Volatility

EPRF vs. PFXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) is 2.14%, while VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that EPRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPRFPFXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

3.14%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.46%

6.89%

-1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.55%

8.94%

-1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.81%

10.91%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.49%

13.21%

+0.28%

EPRF vs. PFXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PFXF's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPRF vs. PFXF - Dividend Comparison

EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, more than PFXF's 6.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPRF
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF
6.18%6.03%6.13%5.71%5.67%4.70%4.92%5.01%5.27%2.59%0.00%0.00%
PFXF
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
6.08%6.72%7.82%7.88%6.74%4.66%5.19%5.35%6.56%5.93%5.81%5.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPRF and PFXF have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFXF has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to EPRF (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPRF dropped -26.82% vs PFXF's -35.49%.

On 5-year performance, PFXF leads with 4.48% vs -1.97% for EPRF. On fees, PFXF is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, EPRF has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PFXF has performed better with a 4.48% return vs -1.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFXF is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for EPRF.

EPRF has the higher dividend yield at 6.18%, compared with 6.08% for PFXF.

EPRF tracks S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index, while PFXF tracks Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities ex Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EPRF and 0.41% for PFXF.

PFXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPRF and PFXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer