EPRF vs. FCVT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT).

EPRF and FCVT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EPRF is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index. It was launched on May 24, 2016. FCVT is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Nov 4, 2015.

Performance

EPRF vs. FCVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EPRF vs. FCVT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF	-4.28%	2.69%	3.46%	9.43%	-20.68%	1.37%	7.38%	19.54%	-5.58%	-0.31%
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF	2.96%	19.60%	11.92%	7.12%	-20.88%	4.23%	51.02%	22.30%	-2.28%	4.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPRF achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than FCVT's 2.96% return.

EPRF

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -3.39%
• YTD: -4.28%
• 6M: -6.59%
• 1Y: -0.37%
• 3Y*: 2.18%
• 5Y*: -2.07%
• 10Y*: —

FCVT

• 1D: 2.83%
• 1M: -3.42%
• YTD: 2.96%
• 6M: 3.95%
• 1Y: 28.88%
• 3Y*: 13.46%
• 5Y*: 3.16%
• 10Y*: 10.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPRF vs. FCVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FCVT's 0.95% expense ratio.

FCVT

First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF

EPRF

Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF

Return for Risk

EPRF vs. FCVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPRF

EPRF Risk / Return Rank: 10
EPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
EPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
EPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 10
EPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
EPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 10

FCVT

FCVT Risk / Return Rank: 88
FCVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FCVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FCVT Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FCVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FCVT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPRF vs. FCVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EPRF	FCVT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.04	1.81	-1.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.00	2.38	-2.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.32	-0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.08	3.37	-3.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.20	11.45	-11.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EPRF vs. FCVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPRF Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the FCVT Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPRF and FCVT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EPRF	FCVT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04	1.81	-1.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.18	0.23	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.57	-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between EPRF and FCVT is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EPRF vs. FCVT - Dividend Comparison

EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, more than FCVT's 1.65% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF	6.30%	6.03%	6.13%	5.71%	5.67%	4.70%	4.92%	5.01%	5.27%	2.59%	0.00%	0.00%
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF	1.65%	1.98%	1.30%	1.76%	3.71%	23.07%	1.72%	1.60%	1.85%	2.18%	1.88%	0.59%

Drawdowns

EPRF vs. FCVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum FCVT drawdown of -31.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and FCVT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPRF	FCVT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.82%	-31.79%	+4.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.59%	-8.47%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.23%	-30.43%	+5.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.78%	-5.88%	-6.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.31%	-10.52%	+3.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	2.49%	+0.76%

Volatility

EPRF vs. FCVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) is 2.42%, while First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that EPRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPRF	FCVT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.42%	7.16%	-4.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.27%	12.93%	-7.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.88%	16.06%	-7.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.73%	13.94%	-2.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.57%	16.94%	-3.37%