EPRF vs. FCVT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EPRF (Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF) and FCVT (First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. EPRF is passively managed, while FCVT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPRF returned -2.02%/yr vs 6.06%/yr for FCVT. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPRF charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FCVT.

Performance

EPRF vs. FCVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPRF achieves a -2.15% return, which is significantly lower than FCVT's 15.27% return.

EPRF

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -0.76%
• 6M: -4.59%
• YTD: -2.15%
• 1Y: -1.05%
• 3Y*: 3.16%
• 5Y*: -2.02%
• 10Y*: —

FCVT

• 1D: -2.43%
• 1M: -7.95%
• 6M: 8.71%
• YTD: 15.27%
• 1Y: 26.24%
• 3Y*: 16.15%
• 5Y*: 6.06%
• 10Y*: 11.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPRF vs. FCVT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF	-2.15%	2.69%	3.46%	9.43%	-20.68%	1.37%	7.38%	19.54%	-5.58%	-0.39%
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF	15.27%	19.60%	11.92%	7.12%	-20.88%	4.23%	51.02%	22.30%	-2.28%	5.08%

Correlation

The correlation between EPRF and FCVT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2017	0.42

Return for Risk

EPRF vs. FCVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPRF

EPRF Risk / Return Rank: 8
EPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
EPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
EPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
EPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
EPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

FCVT

FCVT Risk / Return Rank: 56
FCVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FCVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
FCVT Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FCVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FCVT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPRF vs. FCVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPRF	FCVT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	1.46	-1.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.15	1.95	-2.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.25	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.12	2.71	-2.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.23	9.48	-9.71

EPRF vs. FCVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPRF Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the FCVT Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPRF and FCVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPRF vs. FCVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum FCVT drawdown of -31.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and FCVT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPRF	FCVT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.82%	-31.79%	+4.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.59%	-9.71%	+1.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.29%	-15.06%	+2.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.23%	-30.43%	+5.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.84%	-9.71%	-1.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.42%	-10.29%	+2.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.61%	2.77%	+1.84%

Volatility

EPRF vs. FCVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) is 2.31%, while First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that EPRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPRF	FCVT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.31%	6.34%	-4.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.57%	15.02%	-9.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.45%	18.09%	-10.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.85%	14.56%	-2.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.42%	14.88%	-1.46%

EPRF vs. FCVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FCVT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPRF vs. FCVT - Dividend Comparison

EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, more than FCVT's 1.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF	6.17%	6.03%	6.13%	5.71%	5.67%	4.70%	4.92%	5.01%	5.27%	2.59%	0.00%	0.00%
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF	1.20%	1.98%	1.30%	1.76%	3.71%	23.07%	1.72%	1.60%	1.85%	2.18%	1.88%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPRF and FCVT in my portfolio?

EPRF and FCVT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPRF or FCVT?

FCVT has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to EPRF (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPRF dropped -26.82% vs FCVT's -31.79%.

Which ETF is better, EPRF or FCVT?

On 5-year performance, FCVT leads with 6.06% vs -2.02% for EPRF. On fees, EPRF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, EPRF has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPRF or FCVT?

Over the 5-year period, FCVT has performed better with a 6.06% return vs -2.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPRF or FCVT?

EPRF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FCVT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPRF or FCVT?

EPRF has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 1.20% for FCVT.

What is the main difference between EPRF and FCVT?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EPRF and 0.95% for FCVT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.