EPRF vs. EVPF
EPRF (Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF) and EVPF (Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. EPRF is passively managed, while EVPF is actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPRF charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EVPF.
Performance
EPRF vs. EVPF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EPRF
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- -2.39%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 2.04%
- 3Y*
- 2.39%
- 5Y*
- -1.97%
- 10Y*
- —
EVPF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPRF vs. EVPF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | -1.54% |
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPRF and EVPF is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPRF vs. EVPF — Risk / Return Rank
EPRF
EVPF
EPRF vs. EVPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF (EVPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPRF | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.44 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.51 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPRF | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 1.13 | -1.04 |
Drawdowns
EPRF vs. EVPF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, which is greater than EVPF's maximum drawdown of -2.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and EVPF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPRF | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.82% | -2.36% | -24.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.06% | -0.17% | -10.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -0.52% | -6.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | — | — |
Volatility
EPRF vs. EVPF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPRF | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.55% | 4.31% | +3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 4.31% | +7.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.49% | 4.31% | +9.18% |
EPRF vs. EVPF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than EVPF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPRF vs. EVPF - Dividend Comparison
EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, more than EVPF's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | 6.18% | 6.03% | 6.13% | 5.71% | 5.67% | 4.70% | 4.92% | 5.01% | 5.27% | 2.59% |
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPRF and EVPF have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EVPF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EVPF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for EPRF.
EPRF has the higher dividend yield at 6.18%, compared with 1.08% for EVPF.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EPRF and 0.39% for EVPF.
Find the right allocation for EPRF and EVPF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer