EVPF vs. CSSD

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

EVPF (Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF) and CSSD (Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF) are both Preferred Stock funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EVPF charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for CSSD.

Performance

EVPF vs. CSSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF (EVPF) and Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EVPF

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -0.24%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CSSD

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.11%
• 6M: 2.03%
• YTD: 3.22%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF	$130.43K	$632.60K	$285.67K
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF	$215.17K	$323.39K	$353.47K

EVPF vs. CSSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF	1.52%
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF	2.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EVPF and CSSD is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2026	0.64

Return for Risk

EVPF vs. CSSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF (EVPF) and Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

EVPF vs. CSSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVPF drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, roughly equal to the maximum CSSD drawdown of -2.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVPF and CSSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVPF	CSSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.36%	-2.32%	-0.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.07%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.45%	-0.28%	-0.17%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EVPF	CSSD	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.77%	2.96%	+0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.77%	2.96%	+0.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.77%	2.96%	+0.81%

EVPF vs. CSSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVPF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CSSD's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVPF vs. CSSD - Dividend Comparison

EVPF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than CSSD's 3.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF	3.63%	0.53%
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF	2.09%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVPF and CSSD in my portfolio?

EVPF and CSSD have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EVPF or CSSD?

On fees, EVPF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVPF or CSSD?

EVPF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CSSD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVPF or CSSD?

CSSD has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 2.09% for EVPF.

What is the main difference between EVPF and CSSD?

They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and Cohen & Steers. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EVPF and 0.49% for CSSD.