EPP vs. BKEM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM).
EPP and BKEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EPP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific ex-Japan Index. It was launched on Oct 25, 2001. BKEM is a passively managed fund by BNY Mellon that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2020. Both EPP and BKEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EPP vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EPP vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPP iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF | 5.29% | 19.70% | 4.76% | 5.76% | -6.59% | 4.26% | 37.42% |
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 5.83% | 30.55% | 7.53% | 8.68% | -19.43% | -3.91% | 47.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPP achieves a 5.29% return, which is significantly lower than BKEM's 5.83% return.
EPP
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -6.44%
- YTD
- 5.29%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- 1Y
- 25.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.91%
- 5Y*
- 5.11%
- 10Y*
- 7.32%
BKEM
- 1D
- 3.62%
- 1M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 33.56%
- 3Y*
- 15.90%
- 5Y*
- 3.63%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EPP vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPP has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EPP vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank
EPP
BKEM
EPP vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPP | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 1.68 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 2.26 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.33 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 2.53 | -0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.35 | 9.54 | -1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPP | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.68 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.20 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.58 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between EPP and BKEM is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EPP vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison
EPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than BKEM's 2.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPP iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF | 3.58% | 3.77% | 3.81% | 4.10% | 4.37% | 4.58% | 2.28% | 3.89% | 5.00% | 4.15% | 3.96% | 4.90% |
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.13% | 2.25% | 2.76% | 3.02% | 3.15% | 2.22% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EPP vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPP drawdown since its inception was -66.01%, which is greater than BKEM's maximum drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPP and BKEM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPP | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.01% | -39.48% | -26.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.34% | -13.11% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.31% | -36.65% | +10.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.54% | -9.96% | +3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.68% | -16.41% | +5.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 3.48% | -0.51% |
Volatility
EPP vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) is 7.31%, while BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a volatility of 10.47%. This indicates that EPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EPP | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 10.47% | -3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.13% | 14.67% | -3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.61% | 20.07% | -1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 18.32% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 18.88% | +0.23% |