PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPP vs. EWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPP vs. EWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPP achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 68.60% return. Over the past 10 years, EPP has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 7.72%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.93% annualized return.


EPP

1D
1.05%
1M
0.90%
YTD
10.76%
6M
12.74%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
13.66%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
7.72%

EWT

1D
0.65%
1M
19.05%
YTD
68.60%
6M
73.34%
1Y
112.02%
3Y*
38.44%
5Y*
18.61%
10Y*
19.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPP vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPP
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
10.76%19.70%4.76%5.76%-6.59%4.26%6.04%18.30%-10.78%26.05%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
68.60%28.38%16.11%23.97%-28.90%26.18%31.50%33.36%-9.90%26.81%

Correlation

The correlation between EPP and EWT is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2001

0.66

The correlation between EPP and EWT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPP vs. EWT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPP
EWT

Financial Services

46.0%
13.0%

Basic Materials

14.6%
3.5%

Industrials

8.6%
4.9%

Real Estate

7.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
1.9%

Healthcare

3.7%
0.8%

Utilities

3.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
1.1%

Energy

2.9%

-

Communication Services

2.7%
1.9%

Technology

1.1%
72.9%

Financial Services

EPP
46.0%
EWT
13.0%

Basic Materials

EPP
14.6%
EWT
3.5%

Industrials

EPP
8.6%
EWT
4.9%

Real Estate

EPP
7.8%
EWT

-

Consumer Cyclical

EPP
6.0%
EWT
1.9%

Healthcare

EPP
3.7%
EWT
0.8%

Utilities

EPP
3.6%
EWT

-

Consumer Defensive

EPP
3.0%
EWT
1.1%

Energy

EPP
2.9%
EWT

-

Communication Services

EPP
2.7%
EWT
1.9%

Technology

EPP
1.1%
EWT
72.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPP vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPP
EPP Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPP Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPP Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPP vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPPEWTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

4.49

-3.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

5.05

-3.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.70

-0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

10.83

-8.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.33

33.31

-25.98

EPP vs. EWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the EWT Sharpe Ratio of 4.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPP and EWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPPEWTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

4.49

-3.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.83

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.93

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.26

+0.13

Drawdowns

EPP vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPP drawdown since its inception was -66.01%, roughly equal to the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPP and EWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPPEWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.01%

-64.37%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.79%

-10.51%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.29%

-25.66%

+6.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.31%

-38.88%

+12.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.30%

-38.88%

-0.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

0.00%

-1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.62%

-19.23%

+8.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

3.42%

-0.64%

Volatility

EPP vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) is 4.71%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 10.39%. This indicates that EPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPPEWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

10.39%

-5.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.89%

20.54%

-8.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.52%

25.10%

-10.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

22.59%

-5.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

21.60%

-2.49%

EPP vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPP has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPP vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison

EPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than EWT's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPP
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
3.41%3.77%3.81%4.10%4.37%4.58%2.28%3.89%5.00%4.15%3.96%4.90%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.63%4.43%3.32%8.12%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPP and EWT have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWT has higher volatility (10.39%) compared to EPP (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPP dropped -66.01% vs EWT's -64.37%.

On 10-year performance, EWT leads with 19.93% vs 7.72% for EPP. On fees, EPP is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, EPP has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWT has performed better with a 19.93% return vs 7.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPP is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.

EPP has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 2.63% for EWT.

EPP tracks MSCI Pacific ex-Japan Index, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EPP and 0.59% for EWT.

EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.49 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPP and EWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer