EPM vs. PAA
Compare and contrast key facts about Evolution Petroleum Corporation (EPM) and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA).
Performance
EPM vs. PAA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EPM vs. PAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPM Evolution Petroleum Corporation | 32.78% | -25.17% | -2.04% | -17.30% | 58.73% | 86.00% | -44.78% | -14.47% | 4.19% | -28.70% |
PAA Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. | 27.03% | 14.30% | 21.38% | 39.18% | 35.79% | 22.24% | -50.79% | -2.28% | 2.31% | -31.34% |
Fundamentals
EPM:
$155.72M
PAA:
$15.76B
EPM:
$0.16
PAA:
$2.04
EPM:
28.10
PAA:
10.95
EPM:
0.39
PAA:
0.21
EPM:
1.81
PAA:
0.35
EPM:
2.31
PAA:
1.60
EPM:
$85.64M
PAA:
$44.80B
EPM:
$8.08M
PAA:
$2.17B
EPM:
$14.91M
PAA:
$2.96B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPM achieves a 32.78% return, which is significantly higher than PAA's 27.03% return. Over the past 10 years, EPM has underperformed PAA with an annualized return of 6.16%, while PAA has yielded a comparatively higher 8.77% annualized return.
EPM
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- YTD
- 32.78%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- -2.09%
- 3Y*
- -1.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.49%
- 10Y*
- 6.16%
PAA
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 6.79%
- YTD
- 27.03%
- 6M
- 36.78%
- 1Y
- 21.75%
- 3Y*
- 31.34%
- 5Y*
- 29.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPM vs. PAA — Risk / Return Rank
EPM
PAA
EPM vs. PAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolution Petroleum Corporation (EPM) and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPM | PAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | 0.90 | -0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.16 | 1.28 | -1.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.18 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 0.98 | -1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 2.05 | -2.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPM | PAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 | 0.90 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 1.08 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.21 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.30 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between EPM and PAA is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EPM vs. PAA - Dividend Comparison
EPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.48%, more than PAA's 6.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPM Evolution Petroleum Corporation | 10.48% | 13.56% | 9.18% | 8.26% | 5.83% | 4.55% | 6.14% | 7.31% | 5.87% | 4.23% | 2.15% | 4.16% |
PAA Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. | 6.97% | 8.46% | 7.44% | 7.06% | 7.08% | 7.71% | 10.92% | 7.50% | 5.99% | 9.45% | 8.21% | 11.93% |
Drawdowns
EPM vs. PAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPM drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than PAA's maximum drawdown of -91.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPM and PAA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPM | PAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -91.99% | -8.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.29% | -20.96% | -17.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.45% | -26.11% | -33.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.49% | -87.92% | +7.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.84% | -12.09% | -87.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -96.47% | -25.87% | -70.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.08% | 9.99% | +7.09% |
Volatility
EPM vs. PAA - Volatility Comparison
Evolution Petroleum Corporation (EPM) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) at 5.97%. This indicates that EPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EPM | PAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.45% | 5.97% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.01% | 11.96% | +13.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.39% | 24.36% | +11.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.66% | 27.11% | +18.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.91% | 42.28% | +7.63% |
Financials
EPM vs. PAA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Evolution Petroleum Corporation and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EPM vs. PAA - Profitability Comparison
EPM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Evolution Petroleum Corporation reported a gross profit of -8.20M and revenue of 20.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -39.7%.
PAA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported a gross profit of 712.00M and revenue of 10.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.7%.
EPM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Evolution Petroleum Corporation reported an operating income of 658.00K and revenue of 20.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
PAA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported an operating income of 354.00M and revenue of 10.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.
EPM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Evolution Petroleum Corporation reported a net income of 3.47M and revenue of 20.68M, resulting in a net margin of 16.8%.
PAA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported a net income of 342.00M and revenue of 10.56B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.