PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPM vs. CVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EPM vs. CVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Evolution Petroleum Corporation (EPM) and CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPM achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly higher than CVI's 8.91% return. Over the past 10 years, EPM has underperformed CVI with an annualized return of 2.65%, while CVI has yielded a comparatively higher 19.31% annualized return.


EPM

1D
1.05%
1M
-10.11%
YTD
14.93%
6M
14.60%
1Y
-9.52%
3Y*
-13.71%
5Y*
2.51%
10Y*
2.65%

CVI

1D
-2.51%
1M
-16.18%
YTD
8.91%
6M
5.38%
1Y
2.99%
3Y*
10.02%
5Y*
26.88%
10Y*
19.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPM vs. CVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPM
Evolution Petroleum Corporation
14.93%-25.17%-2.04%-17.30%58.73%86.00%-44.78%-14.47%4.19%-28.70%
CVI
CVR Energy, Inc.
8.91%51.83%-34.88%11.51%210.18%25.69%-61.31%25.44%-0.80%59.94%

Correlation

The correlation between EPM and CVI is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2007

0.32

The correlation between EPM and CVI shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EPM:

$130.82M

CVI:

$2.73B

EPS

EPM:

-$0.11

CVI:

-$0.42

PS Ratio

EPM:

1.57

CVI:

0.36

PB Ratio

EPM:

2.24

CVI:

5.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

EPM:

$83.24M

CVI:

$7.50B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EPM:

$3.92M

CVI:

-$1.54B

EBITDA (TTM)

EPM:

$2.18M

CVI:

$441.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPM vs. CVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPM
EPM Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
EPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPM Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPM Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CVI
CVI Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVI Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVI Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPM vs. CVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolution Petroleum Corporation (EPM) and CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EPMCVIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.05

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

0.06

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.56

0.13

-0.69

EPM vs. CVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPM Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the CVI Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPM and CVI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPM vs. CVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPM drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than CVI's maximum drawdown of -92.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPM and CVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPMCVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-92.39%

-7.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.29%

-48.21%

+9.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.45%

-56.17%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.45%

-56.17%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.49%

-80.26%

-0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.86%

-30.75%

-69.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-96.48%

-35.14%

-61.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.96%

22.69%

-5.73%

Volatility

EPM vs. CVI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolution Petroleum Corporation (EPM) is 9.55%, while CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI) has a volatility of 13.89%. This indicates that EPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPMCVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.55%

13.89%

-4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.94%

41.12%

-10.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.07%

52.06%

-12.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.48%

57.98%

-12.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.07%

59.14%

-9.07%

Dividends

EPM vs. CVI - Dividend Comparison

EPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.47%, more than CVI's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVI
CVR Energy, Inc.
1.73%8.88%8.00%14.85%32.04%14.28%8.05%7.54%7.25%5.37%7.88%5.08%
EPM
Evolution Petroleum Corporation
12.47%13.56%9.18%8.26%5.83%4.55%6.14%7.31%5.87%4.23%2.15%4.16%

Financials

EPM vs. CVI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Evolution Petroleum Corporation and CVR Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
20.17M
1.98B
(EPM) Total Revenue
(CVI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


EPM and CVI have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVI has higher volatility (13.89%) compared to EPM (9.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPM dropped -99.99% vs CVI's -92.39%.

CVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPM and CVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer