PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPIN vs. GDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPIN vs. GDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPIN achieves a 24.57% return, which is significantly higher than GDIV's 11.70% return.


EPIN

1D
0.11%
1M
9.68%
YTD
24.57%
6M
28.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDIV

1D
0.30%
1M
2.77%
YTD
11.70%
6M
11.92%
1Y
24.86%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPIN vs. GDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EPIN
Harbor International Equity ETF
24.57%14.68%
GDIV
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
11.70%12.25%

Correlation

The correlation between EPIN and GDIV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.72

EPIN vs. GDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPIN
GDIV

Technology

29.2%
23.4%

Industrials

21.3%
16.2%

Financial Services

19.4%
18.2%

Basic Materials

7.7%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
8.9%

Healthcare

6.8%
14.4%

Energy

5.1%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
7.4%

Communication Services

1.2%

-

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Utilities

-

4.1%

Technology

EPIN
29.2%
GDIV
23.4%

Industrials

EPIN
21.3%
GDIV
16.2%

Financial Services

EPIN
19.4%
GDIV
18.2%

Basic Materials

EPIN
7.7%
GDIV
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EPIN
6.8%
GDIV
8.9%

Healthcare

EPIN
6.8%
GDIV
14.4%

Energy

EPIN
5.1%
GDIV
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

EPIN
2.6%
GDIV
7.4%

Communication Services

EPIN
1.2%
GDIV

-

Real Estate

EPIN

-

GDIV
1.1%

Utilities

EPIN

-

GDIV
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPIN vs. GDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPIN

GDIV
GDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPIN vs. GDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EPIN vs. GDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPINGDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.50

0.85

+1.65

Drawdowns

EPIN vs. GDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPIN drawdown since its inception was -11.64%, smaller than the maximum GDIV drawdown of -18.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPIN and GDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPINGDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-18.93%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

0.00%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-3.18%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

Volatility

EPIN vs. GDIV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPINGDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.35%

11.87%

+5.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

15.31%

+2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

15.31%

+2.04%

EPIN vs. GDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPIN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPIN vs. GDIV - Dividend Comparison

EPIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than GDIV's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EPIN
Harbor International Equity ETF
0.63%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDIV
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
1.13%1.19%1.30%2.27%5.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPIN and GDIV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for EPIN.

GDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.63% for EPIN.

EPIN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GDIV is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for EPIN and 0.50% for GDIV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPIN and GDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer