EPGFX vs. CEF
Compare and contrast key facts about EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF).
EPGFX is managed by Euro Pacific Asset Management. It was launched on Jul 18, 2013. CEF is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018.
Performance
EPGFX vs. CEF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EPGFX vs. CEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund | 5.67% | 129.06% | 8.51% | 2.31% | -14.00% | -18.06% | 36.99% | 37.25% | -13.85% | 12.73% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 5.55% | 92.76% | 24.07% | 6.80% | 1.07% | -8.32% | 31.99% | 16.91% | -6.34% | 18.78% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EPGFX having a 5.67% return and CEF slightly lower at 5.55%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EPGFX having a 15.85% annualized return and CEF not far behind at 15.18%.
EPGFX
- 1D
- 6.92%
- 1M
- -19.20%
- YTD
- 5.67%
- 6M
- 17.58%
- 1Y
- 93.89%
- 3Y*
- 33.01%
- 5Y*
- 16.27%
- 10Y*
- 15.85%
CEF
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -13.66%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 30.90%
- 1Y
- 71.30%
- 3Y*
- 36.73%
- 5Y*
- 22.27%
- 10Y*
- 15.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EPGFX vs. CEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPGFX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CEF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EPGFX vs. CEF — Risk / Return Rank
EPGFX
CEF
EPGFX vs. CEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPGFX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | 1.92 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.62 | 2.19 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.35 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 2.62 | +0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.66 | 9.59 | +3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPGFX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 1.92 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.94 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.71 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.23 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between EPGFX and CEF is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EPGFX vs. CEF - Dividend Comparison
EPGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.49%, while CEF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund | 6.49% | 6.86% | 10.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.49% | 8.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.56% | 19.31% | 0.00% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
Drawdowns
EPGFX vs. CEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPGFX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, smaller than the maximum CEF drawdown of -62.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPGFX and CEF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPGFX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.70% | -62.29% | +5.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.88% | -26.77% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.59% | -26.77% | -20.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.03% | -29.10% | -21.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.42% | -18.36% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.10% | -27.38% | +5.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.35% | 7.31% | +0.04% |
Volatility
EPGFX vs. CEF - Volatility Comparison
EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) has a higher volatility of 16.68% compared to Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) at 13.56%. This indicates that EPGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EPGFX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.68% | 13.56% | +3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.39% | 35.38% | -2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.05% | 37.38% | +1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.14% | 23.78% | +8.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.65% | 21.58% | +11.07% |