PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPGFX vs. ^XAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EPGFX vs. ^XAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) and PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index (^XAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPGFX achieves a -9.57% return, which is significantly lower than ^XAU's -7.88% return. Over the past 10 years, EPGFX has underperformed ^XAU with an annualized return of 7.96%, while ^XAU has yielded a comparatively higher 11.14% annualized return.


EPGFX

1D
-2.83%
1M
-5.95%
6M
-17.31%
YTD
-9.57%
1Y
39.61%
3Y*
29.88%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*
7.96%
ALL TIME*
9.75%

^XAU

1D
2.41%
1M
-3.99%
6M
-17.20%
YTD
-7.88%
1Y
52.69%
3Y*
38.13%
5Y*
17.32%
10Y*
11.14%
ALL TIME*
2.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EPGFX vs. ^XAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPGFX
EuroPac Gold Fund
-9.57%129.06%8.51%2.31%-14.00%-18.06%36.99%37.25%-13.85%12.73%
^XAU
PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index
-7.88%149.51%9.14%4.00%-8.75%-8.14%34.86%51.32%-17.13%8.13%

Correlation

The correlation between EPGFX and ^XAU is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.95

The correlation between EPGFX and ^XAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPGFX vs. ^XAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EPGFX
EPGFX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
EPGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EPGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

^XAU
^XAU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
^XAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XAU Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
^XAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EPGFX vs. ^XAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) and PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index (^XAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EPGFX^XAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.21

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.42

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.70

3.06

-0.36

EPGFX vs. ^XAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPGFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the ^XAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPGFX and ^XAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPGFX vs. ^XAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPGFX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, smaller than the maximum ^XAU drawdown of -83.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPGFX and ^XAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPGFX^XAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.70%

-83.04%

+26.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.63%

-37.41%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.63%

-37.41%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.99%

-45.52%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.03%

-45.52%

-5.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.04%

-32.96%

+1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.11%

-39.73%

+17.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.34%

17.27%

-1.93%

Volatility

EPGFX vs. ^XAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) is 10.24%, while PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index (^XAU) has a volatility of 12.10%. This indicates that EPGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^XAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPGFX^XAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.24%

12.10%

-1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.15%

36.54%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.93%

47.60%

-6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.05%

36.89%

-3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.55%

36.47%

-3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EPGFX and ^XAU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

^XAU has higher volatility (12.10%) compared to EPGFX (10.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPGFX dropped -56.70% vs ^XAU's -83.04%.

^XAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPGFX and ^XAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer