EPGFX vs. FKRCX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EPGFX (EuroPac Gold Fund) and FKRCX (Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund) are both Precious Metals funds. Over the past 10 years, EPGFX returned 12.75%/yr vs 15.83%/yr for FKRCX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EPGFX charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FKRCX.

Performance

EPGFX vs. FKRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EPGFX having a 5.82% return and FKRCX slightly lower at 5.59%. Over the past 10 years, EPGFX has underperformed FKRCX with an annualized return of 12.75%, while FKRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.83% annualized return.

EPGFX

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: 5.82%
• 6M: 11.36%
• 1Y: 66.17%
• 3Y*: 35.19%
• 5Y*: 12.98%
• 10Y*: 12.75%

FKRCX

• 1D: -2.44%
• 1M: -0.55%
• YTD: 5.59%
• 6M: 17.92%
• 1Y: 85.11%
• 3Y*: 53.21%
• 5Y*: 20.72%
• 10Y*: 15.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPGFX vs. FKRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund	5.82%	129.06%	8.51%	2.31%	-14.00%	-18.06%	36.99%	37.25%	-13.85%	12.73%
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund	5.59%	196.59%	17.64%	2.03%	-23.47%	-4.03%	44.30%	51.48%	-18.11%	-0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between EPGFX and FKRCX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.92

The correlation between EPGFX and FKRCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EPGFX vs. FKRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPGFX

EPGFX Risk / Return Rank: 37
EPGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
EPGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
EPGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
EPGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
EPGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

FKRCX

FKRCX Risk / Return Rank: 47
FKRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FKRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FKRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FKRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FKRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPGFX vs. FKRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EPGFX	FKRCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	2.21	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	2.50	-0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.35	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	3.07	-0.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.49	8.71	-1.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EPGFX vs. FKRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPGFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the FKRCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPGFX and FKRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EPGFX	FKRCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93	2.21	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.62	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.48	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.19	+0.15

Drawdowns

EPGFX vs. FKRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPGFX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, smaller than the maximum FKRCX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPGFX and FKRCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPGFX	FKRCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.70%	-78.85%	+22.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.88%	-31.15%	+2.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.88%	-31.15%	+2.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.20%	-48.79%	+1.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.03%	-49.54%	-1.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.31%	-21.52%	+2.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.03%	-33.74%	+11.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.10%	10.99%	-0.89%

Volatility

EPGFX vs. FKRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) is 12.32%, while Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) has a volatility of 13.56%. This indicates that EPGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPGFX	FKRCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.32%	13.56%	-1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.77%	35.27%	-3.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.77%	42.29%	-3.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.50%	33.82%	-1.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.52%	32.95%	-0.43%

EPGFX vs. FKRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPGFX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FKRCX's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPGFX vs. FKRCX - Dividend Comparison

EPGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, less than FKRCX's 10.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund	6.48%	6.86%	10.36%	0.00%	0.00%	2.49%	8.67%	0.00%	0.00%	2.56%	19.31%
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund	10.18%	10.75%	13.44%	3.12%	0.00%	9.37%	10.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.37%	8.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPGFX and FKRCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, EPGFX and FKRCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EPGFX or FKRCX?

FKRCX has higher volatility (13.56%) compared to EPGFX (12.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPGFX dropped -56.70% vs FKRCX's -78.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FKRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.