ENVA vs. BILI
ENVA (Enova International, Inc.) and BILI (Bilibili Inc.) are both stocks. ENVA operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while BILI operates in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, ENVA returned 39.68%/yr vs -30.66%/yr for BILI. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ENVA vs. BILI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENVA achieves a 20.44% return, which is significantly higher than BILI's -27.37% return.
ENVA
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 13.51%
- YTD
- 20.44%
- 6M
- 16.35%
- 1Y
- 102.88%
- 3Y*
- 53.36%
- 5Y*
- 39.68%
- 10Y*
- 38.77%
BILI
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- -27.37%
- 6M
- -27.40%
- 1Y
- -10.79%
- 3Y*
- 1.92%
- 5Y*
- -30.66%
- 10Y*
- —
ENVA vs. BILI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENVA Enova International, Inc. | 20.44% | 63.95% | 73.19% | 44.28% | -6.32% | 65.36% | 2.95% | 23.64% | -11.55% |
BILI Bilibili Inc. | -27.37% | 35.78% | 48.81% | -48.63% | -48.94% | -45.87% | 360.37% | 27.62% | 48.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENVA and BILI is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.17 |
Fundamentals
ENVA:
$4.99B
BILI:
$8.21B
ENVA:
$12.29
BILI:
CN¥3.12
ENVA:
15.40
BILI:
38.79
ENVA:
1.53
BILI:
1.78
ENVA:
3.56
BILI:
3.57
ENVA:
$3.28B
BILI:
CN¥30.77B
ENVA:
$1.23B
BILI:
CN¥11.33B
ENVA:
$456.13M
BILI:
CN¥1.53B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENVA vs. BILI — Risk / Return Rank
ENVA
BILI
ENVA vs. BILI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) and Bilibili Inc. (BILI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENVA | BILI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 0.99 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | -0.27 | +4.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.44 | -0.60 | +11.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENVA vs. BILI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENVA drawdown since its inception was -84.26%, smaller than the maximum BILI drawdown of -94.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENVA and BILI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENVA | BILI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.26% | -94.30% | +10.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | -52.06% | +27.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.01% | -53.12% | +16.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.84% | -92.97% | +50.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -88.58% | +88.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.82% | -57.96% | +26.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.57% | 23.32% | -13.75% |
Volatility
ENVA vs. BILI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) is 11.26%, while Bilibili Inc. (BILI) has a volatility of 18.55%. This indicates that ENVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BILI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENVA | BILI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.26% | 18.55% | -7.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.77% | 36.58% | -7.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.58% | 49.74% | -11.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.33% | 79.14% | -38.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.25% | 73.93% | -24.68% |
Dividends
ENVA vs. BILI - Dividend Comparison
Neither ENVA nor BILI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ENVA vs. BILI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enova International, Inc. and Bilibili Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ENVA vs. BILI - Profitability Comparison
ENVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 875.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BILI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.76B and revenue of 7.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.
ENVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported an operating income of 207.11M and revenue of 875.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.7%.
BILI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported an operating income of 165.75M and revenue of 7.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.
ENVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported a net income of 91.10M and revenue of 875.14M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
BILI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported a net income of 208.51M and revenue of 7.43B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ENVA and BILI have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BILI has higher volatility (18.55%) compared to ENVA (11.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENVA dropped -84.26% vs BILI's -94.30%.
ENVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENVA and BILI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer