ENSI.L vs. NBIS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ENSI.L (EnSilica plc) and NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) are both stocks. ENSI.L operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while NBIS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past year, ENSI.L returned 149.38% vs 399.16% for NBIS. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ENSI.L vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in EnSilica plc (ENSI.L) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ENSI.L is traded in GBp, while NBIS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NBIS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENSI.L achieves a 114.89% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 179.01% return.

ENSI.L

• 1D: 3.48%
• 1M: -9.82%
• YTD: 114.89%
• 6M: 184.51%
• 1Y: 149.38%
• 3Y*: 14.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NBIS

• 1D: 4.64%
• 1M: 5.05%
• YTD: 179.01%
• 6M: 164.32%
• 1Y: 399.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENSI.L vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ENSI.L EnSilica plc	114.89%	8.05%	-9.37%
NBIS Nebius Group N.V.	179.01%	180.66%	52.53%

Correlation

The correlation between ENSI.L and NBIS is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024	0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap ENSI.L : £97.63M NBIS : $71.79B
EPS ENSI.L : -£0.04 NBIS : $3.17
PS Ratio ENSI.L : 2.09 NBIS : 69.73
PB Ratio ENSI.L : 4.78 NBIS : 9.91
Total Revenue (TTM) ENSI.L : £46.62M NBIS : $877.90M
Gross Profit (TTM) ENSI.L : £17.01M NBIS : $420.60M
EBITDA (TTM) ENSI.L : £1.38M NBIS : -$52.78M

Return for Risk

ENSI.L vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENSI.L

ENSI.L Risk / Return Rank: 89
ENSI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
ENSI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
ENSI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ENSI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ENSI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 87

NBIS

NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 95
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 91
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENSI.L vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EnSilica plc (ENSI.L) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ENSI.L	NBIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	3.58	-1.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	3.79	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.42	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	8.05	-4.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.42	18.58	-9.16

ENSI.L vs. NBIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENSI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the NBIS Sharpe Ratio of 3.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENSI.L and NBIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ENSI.L vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENSI.L drawdown since its inception was -74.15%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -59.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENSI.L and NBIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENSI.L	NBIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.15%	-59.36%	-14.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.93%	-46.25%	+7.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.89%	-11.81%	-6.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.65%	-19.22%	-27.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.49%	20.01%	-5.52%

Volatility

ENSI.L vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EnSilica plc (ENSI.L) is 27.96%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 30.36%. This indicates that ENSI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENSI.L	NBIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.96%	30.36%	-2.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.18%	70.72%	-12.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.11%	103.97%	-29.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.25%	110.15%	-46.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.25%	110.15%	-46.90%

Dividends

ENSI.L vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENSI.L nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENSI.L and NBIS in my portfolio?

ENSI.L and NBIS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.