ENSI.L vs. MU
ENSI.L (EnSilica plc) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, ENSI.L returned 13.06%/yr vs 139.82%/yr for MU. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ENSI.L vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ENSI.L is traded in GBp, while MU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MU values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENSI.L achieves a 110.64% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 250.53% return.
ENSI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- YTD
- 110.64%
- 6M
- 167.57%
- 1Y
- 175.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MU
- 1D
- -7.74%
- 1M
- 57.00%
- YTD
- 250.53%
- 6M
- 336.76%
- 1Y
- 876.33%
- 3Y*
- 139.82%
- 5Y*
- 66.68%
- 10Y*
- 56.14%
ENSI.L vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENSI.L EnSilica plc | 110.64% | 8.05% | 8.75% | -58.12% | 87.25% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 250.53% | 216.00% | 0.77% | 63.34% | -21.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENSI.L and MU is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2022 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
ENSI.L:
£95.69M
MU:
$1.14T
ENSI.L:
-£0.04
MU:
$21.26
ENSI.L:
2.05
MU:
19.44
ENSI.L:
4.69
MU:
15.67
ENSI.L:
£46.62M
MU:
$58.12B
ENSI.L:
£17.01M
MU:
$33.96B
ENSI.L:
£1.38M
MU:
$25.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENSI.L vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
ENSI.L
MU
ENSI.L vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EnSilica plc (ENSI.L) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENSI.L | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -11.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.89 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.47 | 29.68 | -25.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.05 | 119.66 | -107.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENSI.L | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 13.49 | -11.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.54 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
ENSI.L vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENSI.L drawdown since its inception was -74.15%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -83.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENSI.L and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENSI.L | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.15% | -83.28% | +9.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.93% | -29.83% | -9.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.60% | -58.50% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -58.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.51% | -7.74% | -11.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.23% | -26.59% | -20.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.47% | 7.38% | +7.09% |
Volatility
ENSI.L vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
EnSilica plc (ENSI.L) has a higher volatility of 35.63% compared to Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) at 28.84%. This indicates that ENSI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENSI.L | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.63% | 28.84% | +6.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.52% | 53.55% | +3.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.46% | 65.64% | +7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.70% | 51.42% | +12.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.70% | 49.17% | +14.53% |
Dividends
ENSI.L vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
ENSI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENSI.L EnSilica plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
Financials
ENSI.L vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EnSilica plc and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ENSI.L vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
ENSI.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EnSilica plc reported a gross profit of 4.88M and revenue of 12.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.3%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.
ENSI.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EnSilica plc reported an operating income of -355.00K and revenue of 12.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.
ENSI.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EnSilica plc reported a net income of -499.00K and revenue of 12.73M, resulting in a net margin of -3.9%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ENSI.L and MU have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ENSI.L and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer