PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENSI.L vs. COHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ENSI.L vs. COHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in EnSilica plc (ENSI.L) and Coherent, Inc. (COHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ENSI.L is traded in GBp, while COHR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COHR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENSI.L achieves a 110.64% return, which is significantly lower than COHR's 129.51% return.


ENSI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
12.50%
YTD
110.64%
6M
167.57%
1Y
175.00%
3Y*
13.06%
5Y*
10Y*

COHR

1D
1.07%
1M
26.82%
YTD
129.51%
6M
136.24%
1Y
421.85%
3Y*
117.81%
5Y*
45.09%
10Y*
36.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENSI.L vs. COHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ENSI.L
EnSilica plc
110.64%8.05%8.75%-58.12%87.25%
COHR
Coherent, Inc.
129.51%80.96%121.42%17.82%-36.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ENSI.L and COHR is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2022

0.02

The correlation between ENSI.L and COHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

ENSI.L:

-£0.04

COHR:

$1.64K

PS Ratio

ENSI.L:

2.05

COHR:

0.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

ENSI.L:

£46.62M

COHR:

$1.81T

Gross Profit (TTM)

ENSI.L:

£17.01M

COHR:

$1.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

ENSI.L:

£1.38M

COHR:

$960.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENSI.L vs. COHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENSI.L
ENSI.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ENSI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENSI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENSI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ENSI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENSI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

COHR
COHR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
COHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
COHR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
COHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
COHR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENSI.L vs. COHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EnSilica plc (ENSI.L) and Coherent, Inc. (COHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENSI.LCOHRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.61

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

16.67

-12.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.05

45.30

-33.25

ENSI.L vs. COHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENSI.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is lower than the COHR Sharpe Ratio of 6.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENSI.L and COHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENSI.LCOHRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

6.04

-3.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.45

-0.17

Drawdowns

ENSI.L vs. COHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENSI.L drawdown since its inception was -74.15%, which is greater than COHR's maximum drawdown of -69.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENSI.L and COHR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENSI.LCOHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.15%

-69.26%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.93%

-25.51%

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.60%

-55.83%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.51%

-0.82%

-18.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.23%

-27.19%

-20.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.47%

9.37%

+5.10%

Volatility

ENSI.L vs. COHR - Volatility Comparison

EnSilica plc (ENSI.L) has a higher volatility of 35.63% compared to Coherent, Inc. (COHR) at 26.29%. This indicates that ENSI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENSI.LCOHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.63%

26.29%

+9.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.52%

53.49%

+4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.46%

70.42%

+3.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.70%

59.96%

+3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.70%

55.65%

+8.05%

Dividends

ENSI.L vs. COHR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENSI.L nor COHR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ENSI.L vs. COHR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EnSilica plc and Coherent, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00B1.00T1.50T2.00TJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
12.73M
1.81T
(ENSI.L) Total Revenue
(COHR) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ENSI.L values in GBp, COHR values in USD

ENSI.L vs. COHR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EnSilica plc and Coherent, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
38.3%
0
Portfolio components
ENSI.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EnSilica plc reported a gross profit of 4.88M and revenue of 12.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.3%.

COHR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coherent, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.81T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ENSI.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EnSilica plc reported an operating income of -355.00K and revenue of 12.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.

COHR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coherent, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.81T, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

ENSI.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EnSilica plc reported a net income of -499.00K and revenue of 12.73M, resulting in a net margin of -3.9%.

COHR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coherent, Inc. reported a net income of 191.40B and revenue of 1.81T, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ENSI.L and COHR have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENSI.L and COHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer