ENOR vs. TYLD
ENOR (iShares MSCI Norway ETF) and TYLD (Cambria Tactical Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENOR is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while TYLD is a fund fund actively managed by Cambria. ENOR is passively managed, while TYLD is actively managed. Over the past year, ENOR returned 37.30% vs 4.06% for TYLD. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. ENOR charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TYLD.
Performance
ENOR vs. TYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENOR achieves a 28.21% return, which is significantly higher than TYLD's 1.50% return.
ENOR
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 28.21%
- 6M
- 33.17%
- 1Y
- 37.30%
- 3Y*
- 23.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.41%
TYLD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENOR vs. TYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ENOR iShares MSCI Norway ETF | 28.21% | 32.00% | -2.14% |
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF | 1.50% | 4.05% | 5.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENOR and TYLD is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2024 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENOR vs. TYLD — Risk / Return Rank
ENOR
TYLD
ENOR vs. TYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENOR | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 2.55 | -1.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.16 | 34.31 | -30.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.78 | 125.35 | -113.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENOR | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 5.42 | -3.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 2.53 | -2.28 |
Drawdowns
ENOR vs. TYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENOR drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, which is greater than TYLD's maximum drawdown of -1.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOR and TYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENOR | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.35% | -1.06% | -54.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -0.12% | -8.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | 0.00% | -3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.58% | -0.11% | -16.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 0.03% | +3.15% |
Volatility
ENOR vs. TYLD - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) at 0.26%. This indicates that ENOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENOR | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 0.26% | +4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.62% | 0.55% | +13.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 0.75% | +16.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 1.77% | +20.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.02% | 1.77% | +22.25% |
ENOR vs. TYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENOR has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than TYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENOR vs. TYLD - Dividend Comparison
ENOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than TYLD's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENOR iShares MSCI Norway ETF | 2.31% | 2.96% | 6.32% | 5.06% | 4.02% | 2.24% | 2.39% | 3.15% | 2.79% | 2.47% | 2.96% | 3.24% |
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF | 4.69% | 4.38% | 4.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENOR and TYLD have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENOR has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to TYLD (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENOR dropped -55.35% vs TYLD's -1.06%.
On 1-year performance, ENOR leads with 37.30% vs 4.06% for TYLD. On fees, ENOR is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, TYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ENOR has performed better with a 37.30% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENOR is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TYLD.
TYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 2.31% for ENOR.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for ENOR and 0.59% for TYLD.
TYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.42 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENOR and TYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer