PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENOR vs. FDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENOR vs. FDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENOR achieves a 28.21% return, which is significantly higher than FDD's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ENOR has underperformed FDD with an annualized return of 9.41%, while FDD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.


ENOR

1D
-0.57%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
28.21%
6M
33.17%
1Y
37.30%
3Y*
23.56%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
9.41%

FDD

1D
-1.17%
1M
3.51%
YTD
11.53%
6M
17.78%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENOR vs. FDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
28.21%32.00%-2.29%4.80%-12.53%18.69%2.54%12.77%-8.50%21.98%
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
11.53%62.50%0.28%14.16%-16.14%16.03%-3.80%23.79%-8.98%19.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ENOR and FDD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2012

0.68

The correlation between ENOR and FDD shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.69 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ENOR vs. FDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ENOR
FDD

Energy

29.2%
10.8%

Financial Services

22.4%
52.2%

Industrials

13.9%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

12.4%
3.7%

Basic Materials

10.8%
2.9%

Communication Services

5.8%
2.1%

Technology

4.1%

-

Utilities

0.7%
6.0%

Real Estate

0.4%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
12.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Energy

ENOR
29.2%
FDD
10.8%

Financial Services

ENOR
22.4%
FDD
52.2%

Industrials

ENOR
13.9%
FDD
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

ENOR
12.4%
FDD
3.7%

Basic Materials

ENOR
10.8%
FDD
2.9%

Communication Services

ENOR
5.8%
FDD
2.1%

Technology

ENOR
4.1%
FDD

-

Utilities

ENOR
0.7%
FDD
6.0%

Real Estate

ENOR
0.4%
FDD
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ENOR
0.2%
FDD
12.3%

Healthcare

ENOR

-

FDD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENOR vs. FDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENOR
ENOR Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ENOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENOR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ENOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FDD
FDD Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENOR vs. FDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENORFDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

3.53

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.78

11.86

-0.09

ENOR vs. FDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENOR Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the FDD Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENOR and FDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENORFDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.16

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.60

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.50

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.10

+0.16

Drawdowns

ENOR vs. FDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENOR drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, smaller than the maximum FDD drawdown of -74.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOR and FDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENORFDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.35%

-74.77%

+19.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-9.39%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.84%

-13.06%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.65%

-35.11%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.21%

-41.43%

-12.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.15%

-2.26%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.58%

-35.47%

+18.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

2.79%

+0.39%

Volatility

ENOR vs. FDD - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) have volatilities of 5.14% and 5.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENORFDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

5.22%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.62%

12.35%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.43%

15.43%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.18%

18.39%

+3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.02%

20.16%

+3.86%

ENOR vs. FDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENOR has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than FDD's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

ENOR vs. FDD - Dividend Comparison

ENOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than FDD's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
2.31%2.96%6.32%5.06%4.02%2.24%2.39%3.15%2.79%2.47%2.96%3.24%
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
3.55%3.99%7.65%6.85%6.07%3.44%4.01%4.69%5.05%2.78%4.88%4.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENOR and FDD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDD has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to ENOR (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENOR dropped -55.35% vs FDD's -74.77%.

On 10-year performance, FDD leads with 9.96% vs 9.41% for ENOR. On fees, ENOR is cheaper at 0.53% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDD has performed better with a 9.96% return vs 9.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ENOR is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FDD.

FDD has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 2.31% for ENOR.

ENOR tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for ENOR and 0.58% for FDD.

FDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENOR and FDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer