PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENLT vs. HL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ENLT vs. HL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (ENLT) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENLT achieves a 110.58% return, which is significantly higher than HL's -20.29% return.


ENLT

1D
1.62%
1M
3.93%
YTD
110.58%
6M
146.73%
1Y
412.20%
3Y*
68.44%
5Y*
10Y*

HL

1D
2.00%
1M
-27.35%
YTD
-20.29%
6M
-18.68%
1Y
155.56%
3Y*
42.93%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*
13.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENLT vs. HL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ENLT
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares
110.58%163.61%-9.90%6.93%
HL
Hecla Mining Company
-20.29%291.70%2.82%-14.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ENLT and HL is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2023

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ENLT:

$14.04B

HL:

$10.32B

EPS

ENLT:

$0.68

HL:

$0.84

PE Ratio

ENLT:

141.27

HL:

18.18

PEG Ratio

ENLT:

0.70

HL:

0.08

PS Ratio

ENLT:

16.27

HL:

6.47

PB Ratio

ENLT:

6.62

HL:

4.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

ENLT:

$813.08M

HL:

$1.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ENLT:

$446.15M

HL:

$788.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

ENLT:

$670.45M

HL:

$864.40M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENLT vs. HL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENLT
ENLT Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ENLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENLT Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ENLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENLT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

HL
HL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENLT vs. HL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (ENLT) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ENLTHLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.32

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

23.11

2.80

+20.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

75.84

6.33

+69.51

ENLT vs. HL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENLT Sharpe Ratio is 7.68, which is higher than the HL Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENLT and HL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ENLT vs. HL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENLT drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, smaller than the maximum HL drawdown of -97.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENLT and HL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENLTHLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.32%

-97.92%

+58.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.98%

-55.81%

+37.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.32%

-55.81%

+16.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.88%

-51.91%

+41.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.87%

-69.93%

+58.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.47%

24.67%

-19.20%

Volatility

ENLT vs. HL - Volatility Comparison

Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (ENLT) and Hecla Mining Company (HL) have volatilities of 22.24% and 22.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENLTHLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.24%

22.72%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.74%

54.93%

-10.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.27%

72.59%

-18.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.63%

59.35%

-14.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.63%

62.77%

-18.14%

Dividends

ENLT vs. HL - Dividend Comparison

ENLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENLT
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HL
Hecla Mining Company
0.10%0.08%0.81%0.65%0.40%0.72%0.25%0.29%0.42%0.25%0.19%0.53%

Financials

ENLT vs. HL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares and Hecla Mining Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
156.49M
411.43M
(ENLT) Total Revenue
(HL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ENLT vs. HL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares and Hecla Mining Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
71.7%
61.6%
Portfolio components
ENLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares reported a gross profit of 112.21M and revenue of 156.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.

HL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

ENLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares reported an operating income of 81.63M and revenue of 156.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.2%.

HL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.

ENLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares reported a net income of 24.07M and revenue of 156.49M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.

HL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ENLT and HL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HL has higher volatility (22.72%) compared to ENLT (22.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENLT dropped -39.32% vs HL's -97.92%.

ENLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.68 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENLT and HL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer