PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENLT vs. CNRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENLT vs. CNRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (ENLT) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENLT achieves a 99.21% return, which is significantly higher than CNRG's 23.15% return.


ENLT

1D
5.96%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
99.21%
6M
100.58%
1Y
316.56%
3Y*
70.38%
5Y*
10Y*

CNRG

1D
-4.63%
1M
-5.18%
YTD
23.15%
6M
19.33%
1Y
95.92%
3Y*
12.18%
5Y*
2.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENLT vs. CNRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ENLT
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares
99.21%163.61%-9.90%6.93%
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
23.15%50.23%-14.48%-16.84%

Correlation

The correlation between ENLT and CNRG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2023

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENLT vs. CNRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENLT
ENLT Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ENLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENLT Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ENLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENLT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CNRG
CNRG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENLT vs. CNRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (ENLT) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ENLTCNRGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.38

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.74

5.36

+7.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

51.47

13.03

+38.44

ENLT vs. CNRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENLT Sharpe Ratio is 5.71, which is higher than the CNRG Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENLT and CNRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ENLT vs. CNRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENLT drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, smaller than the maximum CNRG drawdown of -68.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENLT and CNRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENLTCNRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.32%

-68.49%

+29.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.03%

-18.01%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.17%

-48.77%

+9.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.70%

-19.92%

+4.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.91%

-31.72%

+19.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.18%

7.39%

-1.21%

Volatility

ENLT vs. CNRG - Volatility Comparison

Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (ENLT) has a higher volatility of 25.58% compared to SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) at 15.67%. This indicates that ENLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENLTCNRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.58%

15.67%

+9.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.00%

27.25%

+19.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.92%

38.05%

+17.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.29%

34.47%

+10.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.29%

35.98%

+9.31%

Dividends

ENLT vs. CNRG - Dividend Comparison

ENLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
1.11%1.46%1.34%1.17%1.23%1.34%0.69%1.16%0.35%
ENLT
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENLT and CNRG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENLT has higher volatility (25.58%) compared to CNRG (15.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENLT dropped -39.32% vs CNRG's -68.49%.

ENLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.71 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENLT and CNRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer