ENHU vs. FNDX
ENHU (iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENHU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. ENHU is actively managed, while FNDX is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ENHU charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
ENHU vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENHU achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return.
ENHU
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
ENHU vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 10.96% | 1.32% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 14.57% | 3.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENHU and FNDX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENHU vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
ENHU
FNDX
ENHU vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENHU | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.74 | 0.79 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
ENHU vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENHU drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENHU and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENHU | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -37.72% | +28.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.13% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -3.55% | +2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.55% | — |
Volatility
ENHU vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENHU | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.21% | 10.22% | +2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 15.18% | -1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 17.50% | -4.29% |
ENHU vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENHU has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ENHU vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
ENHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 0.34% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENHU and FNDX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENHU is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENHU is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.34% for ENHU.
ENHU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ENHU and 0.25% for FNDX.
Find the right allocation for ENHU and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer