PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENHU vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENHU vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENHU achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return.


ENHU

1D
-0.62%
1M
4.83%
YTD
10.96%
6M
11.23%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FNDX

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.88%
YTD
14.57%
6M
14.58%
1Y
32.32%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENHU vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ENHU and FNDX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025

0.79

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENHU vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENHU

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENHU vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ENHU vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENHUFNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.74

0.79

+0.95

Drawdowns

ENHU vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENHU drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENHU and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENHUFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-37.72%

+28.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.13%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.49%

-3.55%

+2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

Volatility

ENHU vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENHUFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.21%

10.22%

+2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

15.18%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

17.50%

-4.29%

ENHU vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENHU has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ENHU vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

ENHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENHU
iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF
0.34%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENHU and FNDX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ENHU is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ENHU is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.34% for ENHU.

ENHU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ENHU and 0.25% for FNDX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENHU and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer